Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35609888›Full record

ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022

Short term, relative effectiveness of four doses versus three doses of BNT162b2 vaccine in people aged 60 years and older in Israel: retrospective, test negative, case-control study.

Sivan Gazit, Yaki Saciuk, Galit Perez, Asaf Peretz, Virginia E Pitzer, Tal Patalon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Safety and Immunogenicity of a Fourth Dose of Omicron BA.1-Adapted BNT162b2 COVID-19 Vaccines in Adults 18-55 Years Old.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Trial
  4. A Bivalent Omicron-BA.4/BA.5-Adapted BNT162b2 Booster in ≥12-Year-Olds.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sivan GazitKahn Sagol Maccabi Research and Innovation Centre, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel gazit_s@mac.org.il.ORCID 0000-0001-9875-3550
Yaki SaciukKahn Sagol Maccabi Research and Innovation Centre, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Galit PerezMaccabitech Institute for Research and Innovation, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Asaf PeretzKahn Sagol Maccabi Research and Innovation Centre, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Virginia E PitzerDepartment of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases and Public Health Modeling Unit, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Tal PatalonKahn Sagol Maccabi Research and Innovation Centre, Maccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7415-1053
Maccabi Healthcare Services · ILMaccabi Institute for Health Services Research · ILYale University · US

Funding

Modeling the impact and cost-effectiveness of next-generation rotavirus vaccine strategies in low- and middle-income countriesR01AI112970 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PITZER, VIRGINIA E · 2015 to 2024
$4.1M
Predicting and monitoring variations in the effects of vaccines against RSVR01AI137093 · NIAID · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Virginia E Pitzer, Daniel Martin Weinberger · 2018 to 2026
$3.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI112970NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI137093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the relative effectiveness of a fourth dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA (BNT162b2) vaccine compared with three vaccine doses over the span of 10 weeks.

designRetrospective, test negative, case-control study, with a matched analysis and an unmatched multiple tests analysis.

settingNationally centralised database of Maccabi Healthcare Services, an Israeli national health fund for 2.5 million people; from 10 January 2022 (seven days after the fourth dose was first given to eligible individuals) to 13 March 2022, an omicron dominant period in Israel.

participants97 499 Maccabi Healthcare Services members aged 60 years and older, who were eligible to receive a fourth vaccine dose and obtained at least one polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test during the study.

main outcome measuresBreakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection, defined as a positive PCR test performed seven or more days after inoculation with the BNT162b2 vaccine; and breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection resulting in severe covid-19 disease, defined as hospital admission or death related to covid-19.

results27 876 participants received the fourth BNT162b2 vaccine dose and 69 623 received three doses only. Of 106 participants who died during the follow-up period, 77 had had their third doses only and 23 had had their fourth doses during the first three weeks after inoculation. In the first three weeks, a fourth dose provided additional protection against both SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe disease relative to three doses of the vaccine. However, relative vaccine effectiveness against infection quickly decreased over time, peaking during the third week at 65.1% (95% confidence interval 63.0% to 67.1%) and falling to 22.0% (4.9% to 36.1%) by the end of the 10 week follow-up period. Unlike relative effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection, the relative effectiveness of a fourth dose against severe covid-19 was maintained at a high level (>72%) throughout follow-up. However, severe disease was a relatively rare event, occurring in <1% of study participants who received four doses or three doses only.

conclusionsA fourth dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine appears to have provided additional protection against both SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe covid-19 disease relative to three vaccine doses. However, relative effectiveness of the fourth dose against infection appears to wane sooner than that of the third dose.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAgedBNT162 VaccineCase-Control StudiesHumansIsraelMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35609888
PMCPMC9127435
OpenAlexW4281397711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.