Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35609609›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2022

Selective representations of texture and motion in mouse higher visual areas.

Yiyi Yu, Jeffrey N Stirman, Christopher R Dorsett, Spencer L Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Ecological Visual Processing in the Mouse.Annual review of neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Inhibition benefits neural system identification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tracking the topology of neural manifolds across populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yiyi YuDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Center for BioEngineering, Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
Jeffrey N StirmanNeuroscience Research Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Christopher R DorsettNeuroscience Research Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Spencer L SmithDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Center for BioEngineering, Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. Electronic address: sls@ucsb.edu.

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN THE NEUROSCIENCEST32NS007431 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Juan Song, Mark J. Zylka · 1997 to 2026
$10.0M
Cortical visual processing for navigationRF1NS121919 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI GOARD, MICHAEL, NIELL, CRISTOPHER M · 2021 to 2021
$2.8M
Modulation of dendritic spiking in vivoR01NS091335 · NINDS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BRENMAN, JAY, SMITH, SPENCER LAVERE · 2015 to 2020
$2.0M
Development and function of higher visual areas in miceR01EY024294 · NEI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SMITH, SPENCER LAVERE · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024294NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091335NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS121919NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mouse visual cortex contains interconnected higher visual areas, but their functional specializations are unclear. Here, we used a data-driven approach to examine the representations of complex visual stimuli by L2/3 neurons across mouse higher visual areas, measured using large-field-of-view two-photon calcium imaging. Using specialized stimuli, we found higher fidelity representations of texture in area LM, compared to area AL. Complementarily, we found higher fidelity representations of motion in area AL, compared to area LM. We also observed this segregation of information in response to naturalistic videos. Finally, we explored how receptive field models of visual cortical neurons could produce the segregated representations of texture and motion we observed. These selective representations could aid in behaviors such as visually guided navigation.

Indexed as

Motion PerceptionVisual CortexAnimalsMiceNeuronsPhotic StimulationVisual FieldsVisual Pathwayscalcium imagingform-motion segregationGabor filter modelmouse higher visual areasmutual informationnaturalistic videovisual edge densityvisual motionvisual neuron modelvisual texture

Identifiers

PMID35609609
PMCPMC9283294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.