ArticleCurrent biology : CB2022
Gliding and parachuting by arboreal salamanders.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative gliding performance of Anolis lizards among three Caribbean ecomorphs.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Forelimb motion and reciprocation mediate aerodynamic control in a gliding lizard.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- A Year at the Forefront of Gliding Locomotion.Biology open · 2023Review
- How wingless salamanders fly.Nature · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wandering salamanders (Aneides vagrans) reside in the crowns of the world's tallest trees and have been observed to readily jump from the canopy when disturbed
Indexed as
Identifiers
35609538What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.