Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35609437›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2022

The relationship between disease activity and UDCA response criteria in primary biliary cholangitis: A cohort study.

David E J Jones, Aaron Wetten, Ben Barron-Millar, Laura Ogle, George Mells, Steven Flack, Richard Sandford, John Kirby, Jeremy Palmer, Sophie Brotherston and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Machine Learning Predicts Treatment Response and Prognostic Pathways From Whole-Blood Transcriptome in Primary Biliary Cholangitis.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

David E J JonesTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom. Electronic address: David.Jones@ncl.ac.uk.
Aaron WettenTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom; Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Ben Barron-MillarTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Laura OgleTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
George MellsDept of Human Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Steven FlackDept of Human Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Richard SandfordDept of Human Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
John KirbyTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Jeremy PalmerTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Sophie BrotherstonTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Laura JopsonTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
John BrainTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Graham R SmithBioinformatics Support Unit (BSU), Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Steve RushtonSchool of Natural and Environmental Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Rebecca JonesLiver Unit, St James' Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Simon RushbrookUniversity Department of Hepatology, UEA Medical School, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Douglas ThorburnLiver Unit, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen D RyderNIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research centre at Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Gideon HirschfieldQueen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
UK-PBC Research Consortium
Jessica K DysonTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom; Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBFreeman Hospital · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L001489/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncertainty exists about how best to identify primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients who would benefit from second-line therapy. Existing, purely clinical, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) response criteria accept degrees of liver biochemistry abnormality in responding patients, emerging data, however, suggest that any degree of ongoing abnormality may, in fact, be associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes. This cohort study explores the link between response status, the biology of high-risk disease and its implications for clinical practice.

methodsProteomics, exploring 19 markers previously identified as remaining elevated in PBC following UDCA therapy, were performed on 400 serum samples, from participants previously recruited to the UK-PBC Nested Cohort between 2014 and 2019. All participants had an established diagnosis of PBC and were taking therapeutic doses of UDCA for greater than 12 months. UDCA response status was assessed using Paris 1, Paris 2 and the POISE criteria, with additional analyses using normal liver blood tests stratified by bilirubin level. Statistical analysis using parametric t tests and 1-way ANOVA.

findingsDisease markers were statistically significantly higher in UDCA non-responders than in responders for all the UDCA response criteria, suggesting a meaningful link between biochemical disease status and disease mechanism. For each of the criteria, however, marker levels were also statistically significantly higher in responders with ongoing liver function test abnormality compared to those who had normalised their liver biochemistry. IL-4RA, IL-18-R1, CXCL11, 9 and 10, CD163 and ACE2 were consistently elevated across all responder groups with ongoing LFT abnormality. No statistically significant differences occurred between markers in normal LFT groups stratified by bilirubin level.

interpretationThis study provides evidence that any ongoing elevation in alkaline phosphatase levels in PBC after UDCA therapy is associated with some degree of ongoing disease activity. There was no difference in activity between patients with normal LFT when stratified by bilirubin. These findings suggest that if our goal is to completely control disease activity in PBC, then normalisation of alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin should be the treatment target. This would also simplify messaging around goals of therapy in PBC, benefiting both patients and clinicians.

fundingFunding by the UK Medical Research Council (Stratified Medicine Programme) and an independent research grant by Pfizer. The study funders played no role in the study design, data collection, data analyses, data interpretation or manuscript writing.

Indexed as

Liver Cirrhosis, BiliaryUrsodeoxycholic AcidAlkaline PhosphataseBilirubinCholagogues and CholereticsCohort StudiesHumansTreatment OutcomeAlkaline PhosphataseBilirubinCholagogues and CholereticsUrsodeoxycholic AcidAlkaline phosphataseHigh-risk diseaseNormal LFTParis 1 criteriaParis 2 criteriaPOISE criteriaPrimary biliary cholangitisProteomicsResponse criteriaStratified medicineUDCAUrsodeoxycholic acid

Identifiers

PMID35609437
PMCPMC9130524
OpenAlexW4281262031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.