Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35609381›Full record

ArticlePhysica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB)2022

Image-based data mining applies to data collected from children.

Lydia J Wilson, Abigail Bryce-Atkinson, Andrew Green, Yimei Li, Thomas E Merchant, Marcel van Herk, Eliana Vasquez Osorio, Austin M Faught, Marianne C Aznar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lydia J WilsonSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memphis, TN, USA. Electronic address: Lydia.Wilson@stjude.org.
Abigail Bryce-AtkinsonDivision of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Andrew GreenDivision of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Yimei LiSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Department of Biostatistics, Memphis, TN, USA.
Thomas E MerchantSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memphis, TN, USA.
Marcel van HerkDivision of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Eliana Vasquez OsorioDivision of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Austin M FaughtSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memphis, TN, USA.
Marianne C AznarDivision of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImage-based data mining (IBDM) is a novel voxel-based method for analyzing radiation dose responses that has been successfully applied in adult data. Because anatomic variability and side effects of interest differ for children compared to adults, we investigated the feasibility of IBDM for pediatric analyses.

methodsWe tested IBDM with CT images and dose distributions collected from 167 children (aged 10 months to 20 years) who received proton radiotherapy for primary brain tumors. We used data from four reference patients to assess IBDM sensitivity to reference selection. We quantified spatial-normalization accuracy via contour distances and deviations of the centers-of-mass of brain substructures. We performed dose comparisons with simplified and modified clinical dose distributions with a simulated effect, assessing their accuracy via sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).

resultsSpatial normalizations and dose comparisons were insensitive to reference selection. Normalization discrepancies were small (average contour distance < 2.5 mm, average center-of-mass deviation < 6 mm). Dose comparisons identified differences (p < 0.01) in 81% of simplified and all modified clinical dose distributions. The DSCs for simplified doses were high (peak frequency magnitudes of 0.9-1.0). However, the PPVs and DSCs were low (maximum 0.3 and 0.4, respectively) in the modified clinical tests.

conclusionsIBDM is feasible for childhood late-effects research. Our findings may inform cohort selection in future studies of pediatric radiotherapy dose responses and facilitate treatment planning to reduce treatment-related toxicities and improve quality of life among childhood cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAdultAlgorithmsChildData MiningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedChildhood cancerDeformable image registrationRadiotherapyVoxel-based analysis

Identifiers

PMID35609381
PMCPMC9197776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.