Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35609036›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Yield optimization, microbial load analysis, and sensory evaluation of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.), lentil (Lens culinaris subsp. culinaris), and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) microgreens grown under greenhouse conditions.

Priti, Seema Sangwan, Bharti Kukreja, Gyan Prakash Mishra, Harsh Kumar Dikshit, Ajeet Singh, Muraleedhar Aski, Atul Kumar, Yashpal Taak, Tsering Stobdan and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Postharvest Quality of Arugula (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

PritiDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Seema SangwanDivision of Microbiology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3174-7372
Bharti KukrejaDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Gyan Prakash MishraDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7023-2638
Harsh Kumar DikshitDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7954-7313
Ajeet SinghDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Muraleedhar AskiDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Atul KumarDivision of Seed Science & Technology, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Yashpal TaakDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0645-0216
Tsering StobdanDRDO-Defence Institute of High Altitude Research, Leh-Ladakh, India.
Shouvik DasDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Ranjeet R KumarDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Devendra Kumar YadavaDivision of Genetics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Shelly PraveenDivision of Biochemistry, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Shiv KumarBiodiversity and Integrated Gene Management Program, ICARDA, Rabat, Morocco.
Ramakrishnan M NairWorld Vegetable Center, South Asia, ICRISAT Campus Patancheru, Hyderabad, India.
Indian Agricultural Research Institute · INDefence Institute of High Altitude Research · INInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microgreens have been used for raw consumption and are generally viewed as healthy food. This study aimed to optimize the yield parameters, shelf life, sensory evaluation and characterization of total aerobic bacteria (TAB), yeast and mold (Y&M), Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Listeria spp. incidence in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek), lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus subsp. culinaris), and Indian mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss.) microgreens. In mungbean and lentil, seeding-density of three seed/cm2, while in Indian mustard, eight seed/cm2 were recorded as optimum. The optimal time to harvest mungbean, Indian mustard, and lentil microgreens were found as 7th, 8th, and 9th day after sowing, respectively. Interestingly, seed size was found highly correlated with the overall yield in both mungbeans (r2 = .73) and lentils (r2 = .78), whereas no such relationship has been recorded for Indian mustard microgreens. The target pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonella spp. and Listeria spp. were not detected; while TAB, Y&M, Shigella spp., and E. coli were recorded well within the limit to cause any human illness in the studied microgreens. Washing with double distilled water for two minutes has shown some reduction in the overall microbial load of these microgreens. The results provided evidence that microgreens if grown and stored properly, are generally safe for human consumption. This is the first study from India on the safety of mungbean, lentils, and Indian mustard microgreens.

Indexed as

FabaceaeLens PlantListeriaVignaEscherichia coliFungiHumansMustard PlantSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID35609036
PMCPMC9128967
OpenAlexW4285741267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.