Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35609019›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Population birth outcomes in 2020 and experiences of expectant mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A 'born in Wales' mixed methods study using routine data.

Hope Jones, Mike Seaborne, Laura Cowley, David Odd, Shantini Paranjothy, Ashley Akbari, Sinead Brophy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hope JonesNational Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing Research, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4312-476X
Mike SeaborneNational Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing Research, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4921-7556
Laura CowleyNational Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing Research, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.
David OddDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
Shantini ParanjothyCentre for Health Data Science, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Ashley AkbariPopulation Data Science, Health Data Research UK, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0814-0801
Sinead BrophyNational Centre for Population Health and Wellbeing Research, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7417-2858
Swansea University · GBCardiff University · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationChief Scientist OfficeMedical Research Council MC_PC_20030Medical Research Council MC_PC_20051Medical Research Council MC_PC_20058Medical Research Council MC_PC_20059Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy can be a stressful time and the COVID-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of life. This study aims to investigate the pandemic impact on pregnancy experience, rates of primary childhood immunisations and the differences in birth outcomes in during 2020 to those of previous years.

methodsSelf-reported pregnancy experience: 215 expectant mothers (aged 16+) in Wales completed an online survey about their experiences of pregnancy during the pandemic. The qualitative survey data was analysed using codebook thematic analysis. Population-level birth outcomes in Wales: Stillbirths, prematurity, birth weight and Caesarean section births before (2016-2019) and during (2020) the pandemic were compared using anonymised individual-level, population-scale routine data held in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank. Uptake of the first three scheduled primary childhood immunisations were compared between 2019 and 2020.

findingsThe pandemic had a negative impact on the mental health of 71% of survey respondents, who reported anxiety, stress and loneliness; this was associated with attending scans without their partner, giving birth alone, and minimal contact with midwives. There was no significant difference in annual outcomes including gestation and birth weight, stillbirths, and Caesarean sections for infants born in 2020 compared to 2016-2019. There was an increase in late term births (≥42 weeks gestation) during the first lockdown (OR: 1.28, p = 0.019) and a decrease in moderate to late preterm births (32-36 weeks gestation) during the second lockdown (OR: 0.74, p = 0.001). Fewer babies were born in 2020 (N = 29,031) compared to 2016-2019 (average N = 32,582). All babies received their immunisations in 2020, but there were minor delays in the timings of immunisations. Those due at 8-weeks were 8% less likely to be on time (within 28-days) and at 16-weeks, they were 19% less likely to be on time.

interpretationWhilst the pandemic had a negative impact on mothers' experiences of pregnancy. Population-level data suggests that this did not translate to adverse birth outcomes for babies born during the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Premature BirthBirth WeightCesarean SectionChildCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMothersPandemicsPregnancyStillbirthWales

Identifiers

PMID35609019
PMCPMC9129046
OpenAlexW4281392488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.