Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35608713›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2022

Breast reconstruction and quality of life five years after cancer diagnosis: VICAN French National cohort.

Memoli Victoria, Bannier Marie, Rey Dominique, Alleaume Caroline, Ben Diane Marc-Karim, Mancini Julien, Lauzier Sophie, Bouhnik Anne-Déborah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Network Pharmacology Analysis, Molecular Docking, andEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Memoli VictoriaAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, ISSPAM, Cancer Biomedicine & Society Group, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2019, 13009, Marseille, BDR, France.
Bannier MarieDepartment of Surgery, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Rey DominiqueAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, ISSPAM, Cancer Biomedicine & Society Group, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2019, 13009, Marseille, BDR, France.
Alleaume CarolineSanté Publique France, Paris, France.
Ben Diane Marc-KarimAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, ISSPAM, Cancer Biomedicine & Society Group, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2019, 13009, Marseille, BDR, France.
Mancini JulienAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, ISSPAM, Cancer Biomedicine & Society Group, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2019, 13009, Marseille, BDR, France. julien.mancini@univ-amu.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9500-8598
Lauzier SophieUniversité Laval, Québec, Canada.
Bouhnik Anne-DéborahAix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, ISSPAM, Cancer Biomedicine & Society Group, Equipe Labellisée Ligue 2019, 13009, Marseille, BDR, France.
Inserm · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRSanté Publique France · FRUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWomen with breast cancer (BC) who have a mastectomy may subsequently undergo breast reconstruction (BR). This study aimed to identify (1) factors associated with having BR, (2) factors associated with immediate BR (IBR) and delayed BR (DBR), and (3) associations between no BR, IBR and DBR and physical and mental quality of life (QoL) 5 years after diagnosis.

methodsAnalyses were based on data from the national French cancer cohort VICAN, which followed a representative sample of cancer survivors, including BC survivors, for 5 years after diagnosis. BR and BR type (IBR/DBR) were identified using medico-administrative databases. The SF12 scale was used to measure mental and physical QoL. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with BR, and linear models to evaluate associations between BR and BR type with QoL.

resultsOf the 1192 BC survivors in VICAN, 32.6% (n = 388) had a mastectomy. Among them, 60.1% (n = 233) had BR. Of these, 38.6% (n = 90) and 61.4% (n = 143) had IBR and DBR, respectively. Compared with women who had BR, women who did not were more likely to be older and to have a lower level of health literacy. Compared with women who did not have BR, those with IBR had better mental QoL, while those who had either IBR or DBR had better physical QoL.

conclusionOlder women and those with inadequate health literacy were less likely to have BR. This may reflect women's preferences, inequalities in care options offered after a mastectomy, and socioeconomic barriers to accessing BR. These issues need further exploration. Furthermore, BR was associated with a better long-term physical QoL. IBR was associated with better mental QoL and should be promoted when possible.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsMammaplastyAgedFemaleHumansMastectomyQuality of LifeBreast cancerBreast reconstructionCancer survivorsPsychosocial outcomesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID35608713
OpenAlexW4281399319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.