Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35608696›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2022

Flow-controlled ventilation in moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19: an open-label repeated-measures controlled trial.

Eleni D Van Dessel, Gregory R De Meyer, Stuart G Morrison, Philippe G Jorens, Tom Schepens

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04894214 (Flow-controlled Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04894214 completednot on this map

Flow-controlled Ventilation (FCV) in Moderate Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Due to COVID-19 - an Interventional Cross-over Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AntwerpRan2021 to 2021Enrolled11ConditionsCOVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Respiration, ArtificialArmsArterial blood gas (ABG), Recording of hemodynamic monitoring, Recording of respiratory monitoring
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eleni D Van DesselDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital/University of Antwerp, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Gregory R De MeyerDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital/University of Antwerp, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Stuart G MorrisonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Antwerp University Hospital/University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
Philippe G JorensDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital/University of Antwerp, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650, Edegem, Belgium.
Tom SchepensDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital/University of Antwerp, Drie Eikenstraat 655, 2650, Edegem, Belgium. tom.schepens@uza.be.
University of Antwerp · BEAntwerp University Hospital · BE

Funding

FRAXA Research Foundation TBM T004620N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlow-controlled ventilation (FCV), a novel mode of mechanical ventilation characterised by constant flow during active expiration, may result in more efficient alveolar gas exchange, better lung recruitment and might be useful in limiting ventilator-induced lung injury. However, data regarding FCV in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are scarce.

objectivesWe hypothesised that the use of FCV is feasible and would improve oxygenation in moderate COVID-19 ARDS compared to conventional ventilation.

designOpen-label repeated-measures controlled trial.

settingFrom February to April 2021, patients with moderate COVID-19 ARDS were recruited in a tertiary referral intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Patients with moderate ARDS (P

interventionParticipants were ventilated in FCV mode for 30 min, and subsequently in volume-control mode (VCV) for 30 min.

main outcome measuresFeasibility of FCV to maintain oxygenation was assessed by the P

resultsFCV was feasible in all patients and no adverse events were observed. There was no difference in the PaO2/FIO2 ratio after 30 min of ventilation in FCV mode (169 mmHg) compared to 30 min of ventilation in VCV mode subsequently (168 mmHg, 95% CI of pseudo-medians (- 10.5, 3.6), p = 0.56). The tidal volumes (p < 0.01) and minute ventilation were lower during FCV (p = 0.01) while PaCO2 was similar at the end of the 30-min ventilation periods (p = 0.31). Mean arterial pressure during FCV was comparable to baseline.

conclusionsThirty minutes of FCV in patients with moderate COVID-19 ARDS receiving neuromuscular blocking agents resulted in similar oxygenation, compared to VCV. FCV was feasible and did not result in adverse events.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04894214.

Indexed as

ARDSCOVID-19Flow-controlled ventilationMechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID35608696
PMCPMC9127816
OpenAlexW4282929200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.