ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2022
Flow-controlled ventilation in moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19: an open-label repeated-measures controlled trial.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04894214 (Flow-controlled Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Flow-controlled Ventilation (FCV) in Moderate Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Due to COVID-19 - an Interventional Cross-over Study
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flow-Controlled Ventilation as a Rescue Strategy in Advanced COVID-19 ARDS: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Flow-controlled ventilation versus pressure-controlled ventilation in moderate to severe ARDS patients: a randomized crossover physiological study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Prolonged Flow-Controlled Ventilation in a Patient With ARDS and Multiple Trauma: A Case Report.Chest · 2025Article
- Flow-controlled ventilation decreases mechanical power in postoperative ICU patients.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2024Article
- A new perspective during laryngo-tracheal surgery: the use of an ultra-thin endotracheal tube (Tritube®) and flow-controlled ventilation-a retrospective case series and a review of the literature.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFlow-controlled ventilation (FCV), a novel mode of mechanical ventilation characterised by constant flow during active expiration, may result in more efficient alveolar gas exchange, better lung recruitment and might be useful in limiting ventilator-induced lung injury. However, data regarding FCV in mechanically ventilated patients with acute lung injury or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are scarce.
objectivesWe hypothesised that the use of FCV is feasible and would improve oxygenation in moderate COVID-19 ARDS compared to conventional ventilation.
designOpen-label repeated-measures controlled trial.
settingFrom February to April 2021, patients with moderate COVID-19 ARDS were recruited in a tertiary referral intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Patients with moderate ARDS (P
interventionParticipants were ventilated in FCV mode for 30 min, and subsequently in volume-control mode (VCV) for 30 min.
main outcome measuresFeasibility of FCV to maintain oxygenation was assessed by the P
resultsFCV was feasible in all patients and no adverse events were observed. There was no difference in the PaO2/FIO2 ratio after 30 min of ventilation in FCV mode (169 mmHg) compared to 30 min of ventilation in VCV mode subsequently (168 mmHg, 95% CI of pseudo-medians (- 10.5, 3.6), p = 0.56). The tidal volumes (p < 0.01) and minute ventilation were lower during FCV (p = 0.01) while PaCO2 was similar at the end of the 30-min ventilation periods (p = 0.31). Mean arterial pressure during FCV was comparable to baseline.
conclusionsThirty minutes of FCV in patients with moderate COVID-19 ARDS receiving neuromuscular blocking agents resulted in similar oxygenation, compared to VCV. FCV was feasible and did not result in adverse events.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04894214.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.