ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2022
How to perform standardized sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women.
Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Single-versus double-layer uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery and risk of uterine scar niche: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- Examining the relationship between cesarean section scar and endometrial cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- Determinants of First-Trimester Residual Myometrial Thickness After Previous Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes in women with placenta accreta spectrum treated by one-step conservative surgery -prospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Platelet-Rich Plasma in Postpartum Wound and Scar Repair: A Narrative Review of Clinical Evidence, Patient-Centered Outcomes, and Translational Challenges.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Effect of cervical changes on the cesarean scar topography after primary cesarean sections: an observational study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Observational
- Diagnostic yield of transvaginal ultrasonography versus saline: infused sonohysterography in the evaluation of post-cesarean section uterine niche.Journal of ultrasound · 2025Article
- Clinical analysis of uterine parameters evaluated by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients treated by hysteroscopic approach with previous cesarean scar defect-related abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective cohort study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- A transvaginal ultrasound-based diagnostic calculator for uterus post-cesarean scar defect.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Article
- Letter on Genovese et al.'s "Impact of Hysterotomy Closure Technique on Subsequent Cesarean Scar Defects Formation: A Systematic Review".Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2023Article
- Value and influencing factors of preoperative MRI evaluation for previous cesarean scar defect associated abnormal uterine bleeding in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.