ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2022
Worldwide Variation in Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Extended Indications for Cochlear Implantation Beyond Conventional Criteria.Turkish archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2026Article
- Impact of cochlear implant indications on outcome, assessed and reported using the international classification of functioning, disability and health model.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Evidence for the Necessity of Objective Hearing Tests in Cochlear Implantation Assessment: Excluding Functional Hearing Loss Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Equitable access to cochlear implants: a perspective on social justice and international obligations.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- How Does Deep Neural Network-Based Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids Impact Cochlear Implant Candidacy?Audiology research · 2024Article
- Cochlear nerve visualization in Normal anatomy and inner ear malformations.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Article
- Datalogging Findings in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Who Never Developed Intelligible Speech.The journal of international advanced otology · 2024Article
- The impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life and psychological status in single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss with tinnitus and influencing factors of implantation intention: a preliminary study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024Article
- Effects of Auditory Training on Speech Recognition in Children with Single-Sided Deafness and Cochlea Implants Using a Direct Streaming Device: A Pilot Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Long-Term Non-Users of Transcutaneous Auditory Implants: Thirty Years of Experience at a Single Institution.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- 'Real-life' benefit of hearing preservation cochlear implantation in the paediatric population: a single-site case-control study.BMJ open · 2023Article
- The Online HEARRING Counselling 1.0 Platform Provides Clinicians with Comprehensive Information on Hearing Device Solutions for Conductive, Mixed, and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Experience of tinnitus in adults who have severe-to-profound hearing loss: A scoping review.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 9 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to find out how candidacy criteria have evolved differently across the globe.
methodsCandidacy criteria and outcome measurements applied in 19 HEARRING clinics were analyzed.
resultsCandidacy criteria vary between clinics. Overall, both bilateral implantation and cochlear implantation in patients with single-sided deafness are becoming more frequent.
conclusionStandardized outcome measurement instruments need to be applied to provide access to the hearing world to all patients with hearing loss who would benefit from cochlear implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.