ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2022
Cancellation of streak artifacts in radial abdominal imaging using interference null space projection.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methods for Uncertainty Quantification in Dictionary Matching to Advance Reliability of Quantitative MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Radon-Guided Wavelet-Domain Attention U-Net for Periodic Artifact Suppression in Brain MRI.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Accelerated free-breathing abdominal T2 mapping with deep learning reconstruction of radial turbo spin-echo data.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Two-parametric prescan calibration of gradient-induced sampling errors for rosette MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Reducing annotation burden in MR: A novel MR-contrast guided contrastive learning approach for image segmentation.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Fat mitigation strategies to improve image quality of radial 4D flow MRI in obese subjects.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn radial abdominal imaging, it has been commonly observed that signal from the arms cause streaks due to system imperfections. We previously introduced a streak removal technique (B-STAR), which is inherently spatially variant and limited to work in image space. In this work, we propose a spatially invariant streak cancellation technique (CACTUS), which can be applied in either image space or k-space and is compatible with iterative reconstructions. THEORY AND
methodsStreak sources are typically spatially localized and can be represented using a low-dimensional subspace. CACTUS identifies the streak subspace by leveraging the spatial redundancy of receiver coils and projects the data onto the streak null space to eliminate the streaks. When applied in k-space, CACTUS can be combined with iterative reconstructions. CACTUS was tested in phantoms and in vivo abdominal imaging using a radial turbo spin-echo pulse sequence.
resultsIn phantoms, CACTUS improved T2 estimation in comparison to previous de-streaking methods. In vivo experiments showed that CACTUS reduced streaks and yielded T2 estimation, in regions affected by streaks, closer to a streak-free reference. Evaluation using a clinical abdominal dataset (n = 20) showed that CACTUS is comparable to B-STAR and yields significantly better signal preservation and streak cancellation than coil removal and suppression methods.
conclusionCACTUS provides superior signal preservation and streak reduction performance compared to coil removal and suppression methods. As a clear advantage over B-STAR, CACTUS can be integrated with iterative reconstruction methods. In abdominal T2 mapping, CACTUS improves the accuracy of parameter estimation in areas affected by streaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.