Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35608032›Full record

Trial reportEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2022

Safety and performance of a novel cerebral embolic protection device for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the PROTEMBO C Trial.

Dariusz Jagielak, Radoslaw Targonski, Christian Frerker, Mohamed Abdel-Wahab, Johannes Wilde, Nikos Werner, Michael Lauterbach, Juergen Leick, Marek Grygier, Marcin Misterski and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04618718 (Cerebral Protection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - The PROTEMBO C Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04618718 nacompletednot on this map

Cerebral Protection in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - The PROTEMBO C Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorProtembis GmbHRan2020 to 2022Enrolled64ConditionsValvular Heart DiseaseArmscerebral embolic protection during TAVR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cerebrovascular Events in Aortic Stenosis: From Native Valve Disease to TAVR-Specific Risk and Prevention.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Final report of the PROTEMBO C Trial: a prospective evaluation of a novel cerebral protection device during TAVI.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Cerebral embolic protection during transcatheter heart interventions.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Dariusz JagielakDepartment of Cardiac & Vascular Surgery, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne, Gdansk, Poland.
Radoslaw TargonskiDepartment of Cardiac & Vascular Surgery, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne, Gdansk, Poland.
Christian FrerkerUniversitätsklinikum Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Mohamed Abdel-WahabHeart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Johannes WildeHeart Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Nikos WernerKrankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Trier, Germany.
Michael LauterbachKrankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Trier, Germany.
Juergen LeickKrankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier, Trier, Germany.
Marek Grygier1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Marcin Misterski1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Andrejs ErglisPauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Inga NarbutePauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Adam Ryszard WitkowskiNational Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Matti AdamUniversity Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Derk FrankUKSH University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Fernando GattoHerzZentrum Saar, Völklingen, Germany.
Tobias SchmidtUniversitätsklinikum Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Alexandra J LanskySection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier · DELeipzig University · DEPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PLUniversity of Lübeck · DEInstitute of Cardiology · PLPauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital · LVUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Latvia · LVYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke remains a feared complication associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Embolic cerebral injury occurs in the majority of TAVI cases and can lead to cognitive dysfunction.

aimsThe PROTEMBO C Trial evaluated the safety and performance of the ProtEmbo Cerebral Protection System in TAVI patients.

methodsForty-one patients were enrolled in this single-arm study conducted at 8 European centres. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of VARC 2-defined major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 30 days; the primary performance endpoint was the composite rate of technical success versus performance goals (PG). Secondary endpoints included brain diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), new lesion volume, and the rate of death or all strokes compared to historical data.

resultsThirty-seven of 41 enrolled patients underwent TAVI with the ProtEmbo device (intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Both primary endpoints were met. MACCE at 30 days was 8.1% (upper limit of the 95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.3% vs PG 25%; p=0.009), and technical success was 94.6% (lower limit of the 95% CI: 82.3% vs PG 75%; p=0.003). New DW-MRI lesion volumes with ProtEmbo were smaller than in historical data, and 87% of patients completing MRI follow-up had no single lesion >150 mm

conclusionsThe PROTEMBO C Trial met its primary safety and performance endpoints compared to prespecified historical PGs. Patients had smaller brain lesion volumes on DW-MRI compared to prior series and no larger single lesions. These results warrant further evaluation of the ProtEmbo in a larger randomised controlled trial (RCT).

Indexed as

Embolic Protection DevicesTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansIntracranial EmbolismStrokeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35608032
PMCPMC10241272
OpenAlexW4282939204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.