Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35607584›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Radiological Diagnosis of a Rare Prepontine Lesion: Ecchordosis Physaliphora.

Nilanjan Sarkar, Somen Chakravarthy, Rohit Chakravarty, Sandipan Mukhopadhyay

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nilanjan SarkarRadiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Somen ChakravarthyRadiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Rohit ChakravartyRadiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Sandipan MukhopadhyayRadiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Tata Main Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecchordosis physaliphora (EP) is a notochordal remnant tissue rarely encountered during routine clinical practice. These lesions usually do not produce any significant symptoms as they are slow-growing and mostly small in size. Symptoms are due to mass effects on adjacent structures when they are large or extra-tumoral hemorrhage. Because of histological similarity with chordoma, diagnosis is challenging, and this differentiation is essential as the disease course and treatment differ significantly. Imaging plays a crucial role in identifying and distinguishing these lesions. We report the case of a 16-year-old male who presented with intermittent headache and neck pain for six months. His routine clinical examinations were within normal limits. On neurological assessment, there was no focal neurodeficit. Evaluation of cranial nerves did not reveal any evidence of palsy. Routine hematological tests were also normal. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain revealed a mass in front of the pons. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for further evaluation revealed a T1 hypointense and T2/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintense lesion in the pre-pontine cistern. There was no enhancement in the mass either in the post-contrast CT or MRI scans. There was no bony erosion and clivus was normal. Based on the location and characteristic imaging features, a diagnosis of EP was made. There may be several other lesions that may present as a mass in the pre-pontine region. Histopathological tests may find it difficult to distinguish between lesions that originate from notochord remnants. Imaging studies play a vital role in confirming the diagnosis and help in planning treatment and follow-up.

Indexed as

chordomaecchordosis physaliphorahamartomamriprepontine

Identifiers

PMID35607584
PMCPMC9123648
OpenAlexW4224257227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.