ArticleCureus2022
Coved and Saddleback ST-Segment Elevations: Brugada Phenocopy vs Brugada Syndrome.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a case of a middle-aged man who presented with near syncope, fever, and dysuria and was incidentally found to have coved ST-segment elevations in leads V1 and V2 confirming Brugada type 1 ECG (electrocardiogram) pattern. This ECG pattern morphed into saddleback ST-segment elevations in precordial leads consistent with type 2 Brugada the following day. Additionally, the patient reported a positive family history of sudden cardiac death. This initial presentation made it impossible to differentiate Brugada phenocopy (BrP) from Brugada syndrome (BrS). Continuous cardiac monitoring was initiated, electrophysiology consulted and fever managed with antipyretics. The patient was diagnosed with prostatitis and bacteremia from E. coli and managed with antibiotics. There were no electrolyte abnormalities nor was the patient on any medications other than tamsulosin for his chronic benign prostate hypertrophy. Once the fever resolved the patient's ECG returned to normal, thus confirming the diagnosis of BrS on day 3 post-admission. Differentiating between BrP and BrS requires ruling out possible underlying causes and determining if resolution in ECG patterns occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.