Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35607536›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Recurrence Yield of Stereotactic Biopsy of Suspicious Calcifications After Breast Conservation Therapy.

Javaria Aleem, Sara Rehman, Mehreen Shafqat, Hamd Zahra, Javeria Ashraf, Imran Khalid Niazi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 56% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Javaria AleemDepartment of Radiology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.
Sara RehmanDepartment of Radiology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.
Mehreen ShafqatDepartment of Radiology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.
Hamd ZahraDepartment of Radiology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.
Javeria AshrafDepartment of Radiology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, PAK.
Imran Khalid NiaziDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, North Midlands, GBR.
Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center · PKUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim To analyze the histopathological outcome of stereotactic biopsies of newly developed suspicious calcifications at lumpectomy scar site in patients with breast conservation surgery (BCS) to determine the incidence of malignancy and the association of mammographic appearance of recurrent microcalcification and their distribution. We also determined the association of disease recurrence with the presence of calcifications in original tumor and lumpectomy resection margins with the risk of recurrence. Materials and methods This study is a retrospective review of mammograms of patients with breast cancer from 2010 to 2021 who underwent stereotactic biopsy of newly developed suspicious calcifications at scar site appreciated on annual follow-up mammogram after breast conservation surgery (BCS) with no mass on correlative ultrasound. The radiological and pathological features of the patients' primary tumor and new calcifications were obtained from the hospital's electronic patient record system. Results A total of 84 patients with breast cancer developed suspicious microcalcifications at the lumpectomy scar site detected on follow-up mammograms after BCS, and 28.6% showed malignant histopathological outcomes. All malignant cases demonstrated pleomorphic morphology. All amorphous (9.5%) and coarse heterogeneous (54.8%) calcifications were benign. The distribution pattern of recurrent malignant calcifications was grouped in 9.5%, regional in 2.4%, linear in 9.5%, and segmental in 7.1%. Calcifications in primary tumors were found in 20.2% of cases. Positive margins were found in 7.1% of these malignant cases. Statistically, there was a strong association between calcification morphology, calcification distribution, presence of calcifications on baseline mammogram, and tumor resection margins. The presence of calcifications in primary tumors and positive resection margins were identified as significant independent risk factors of malignant recurrent calcifications in the logistic regression model and marginal statistical significance in the multivariable logistic regression (MLR) model. Conclusion The interval development of pleomorphic calcifications after BCS with either linear or segmental pattern, positive resection margins, and associated calcifications in primary tumors was related to the increase in the risk of recurrence. Although amorphous and coarse heterogeneous morphology with grouped distribution showed benign outcomes, stereotactic biopsy is recommended to exclude disease recurrence in this high-risk patient population.

Indexed as

breast cancerbreast conservation surgerymammogrammicrocalcificationsrecurrencestereotactic core biopsysuspicious calcificationstumor resection margins

Identifiers

PMID35607536
PMCPMC9123400
OpenAlexW4224233265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.