ArticleCureus2022
Impacts of Microprocessor-Controlled Versus Non-microprocessor-Controlled Prosthetic Knee Joints Among Transfemoral Amputees on Functional Outcomes: A Comparative Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health economic evaluation of microprocessor and non-microprocessor controlled prosthetic knees.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSelecting a prosthetic knee mechanism is an important part of transfemoral (TF) amputee rehabilitation. Prosthetic knee joint selection depends on the users' gait and their energy consumption. This study compares the feedback of transfemoral prosthesis users based on the prosthetic knee design self-reporting responses using the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) outcome measure.
objectiveThis study aims to assess the impact of using a microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee (MCPK) compared with a non-microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knee (NMCPK); feedback on the amputee usage can improve the clinical decision for proper prosthetic knee joint selection.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study with a total of 76 adult unilateral transfemoral amputees classified into two groups. The participants in the first group (38) used the MCPK (Genium, Otto Bock, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and the participants in the second group (38) used the NMCPK (hydraulic and total knee joints). Enrolment was based on a sequence of appointments where all participants answered the PEQ, with different subscale questions including utility (UT), sounds (SO), appearance (AP), residual limb health (RL), frustration (FR), perceived response (PR), social burden (SB), ambulation (AM), and quality of life (QoL). PEQ was filled out during the follow-up appointments at the prosthetic clinic through a visual analog scale (VAS). All data entered into a database were analyzed.
resultThe MCPK participants have significantly improved utility, appearance, ambulation, and total PEQ score, the same results as the male participants. Middle-adulthood (25-40 years) MCPK participants have a significant p-value in the score of utility, frustration, ambulation, and total PEQ score compared to early-adulthood (18-24 years) and late-adulthood (41-60 years) participants. Also, there was a significant improvement in the p-value in ambulation scores in participants using MCPK with amputations caused by diseases compared to amputations caused by trauma and congenital cause.
conclusionTransfemoral amputee prosthesis utility, natural gait, and ambulation improved when using MCPK compared to when using NMCPK during prosthetic rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.