Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35607519›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

A Network Pharmacology Study to Explore the Underlying Mechanism of Safflower (

Qingwen Meng, Huajiang Liu, Haolin Wu, Ding Shun, Chaoling Tang, Xinyin Fu, Xingyue Fang, Yiqian Xu, Bocen Chen, Yiqiang Xie and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Exploring NanoherbalIranian journal of medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. SafflowerInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qingwen MengDeparment of Vasculocardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5289-2229
Huajiang LiuDeparment of Vasculocardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, China.
Haolin WuDepartment of Pharmacology, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, China.
Ding ShunDepartment of Pharmacology, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7901-8136
Chaoling TangDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, China.
Xinyin FuDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, China.
Xingyue FangDepartment of Pharmacology, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, China.
Yiqian XuDepartment of Pharmacology, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, China.
Bocen ChenDepartment of Pharmacology, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, China.
Yiqiang XieCollege of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3038-9008
Qibing LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570100, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4965-0007
Hainan Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safflower has long been used to treat coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. The goal of this study was to predict the therapeutic effect of safflower against CHD using a network pharmacology and to explore the underlying pharmacological mechanisms. Firstly, we obtained relative compounds of safflower based on the TCMSP database. The TCMSP and PubChem databases were used to predict targets of these active compounds. Then, we built CHD-related targets by the DisGeNET database. The protein-protein interaction (PPI) network graph of overlapping genes was obtained after supplying the common targets of safflower and CHD into the STRING database. The PPI network was then used to determine the top ten most significant hub genes. Furthermore, the DAVID database was utilized for the enrichment analysis on Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). To validate these results, a cell model of CHD was established in EAhy926 cells using oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL). Safflower was determined to have 189 active compounds. The TCMSP and PubChem databases were used to predict 573 targets of these active compounds. The DisGeNET database was used to identify 1576 genes involved in the progression of CHD. The top ten hub genes were

Identifiers

PMID35607519
PMCPMC9124127
OpenAlexW4280643212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.