ArticleMaterials today. Proceedings2022
Detecting Covid19 and pneumonia from chest X-ray images using deep convolutional neural networks.
Article in Materials today. Proceedings, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automatic Childhood Pneumonia Diagnosis Based on Multi-Model Feature Fusion Using Chi-Square Feature Selection.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Biodegradation of low-density polythene (LDPE) by a novel strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa WD4 isolated from plastic dumpsite.Biodegradation · 2024Article
- A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Pneumonia Detection in X-ray Images with Attention Ensemble.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Auto-detection of the coronavirus disease by using deep convolutional neural networks and X-ray photographs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Combating Covid-19 using machine learning and deep learning: Applications, challenges, and future perspectives.Array (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Review
- Screening Lung Diseases Using Cascaded Feature Generation and Selection Strategies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the current COVID19 pandemic, we have to weigh human life, prosperity, and value, while implicitly acknowledging that controlling case spread and mortality is a challenge. Identifying COVID19-infected patients and disconnecting them to avoid COVID transmission is one of the most difficult tasks for clinicians. As a result, figuring out who infected with covid19 is crucial. COVID19 is identified using a 4-6-hour reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Another way to detect Coronavirus early in the disease process is by using chest X-rays (CXR).We extracted characteristics from chest X-ray images using VGG16 and ResNet50 deep learning algorithms, then classified them into three groups: viral pneumonia, normal, and COVID19. We ran 15,153 images through the models to see how accurate they were in real-world situations. For detecting COVID19 cases, the VGG16 model has an average accuracy of 89.34 %, whereas ResNet50 has an accuracy of 91.39 %. When utilizing deep learning to identify COVID19, however, a larger dataset is necessary. It has the desired effect of detecting situations accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.