ArticleResuscitation plus2022
Characterization of teamwork and guideline compliance in prehospital neonatal resuscitation simulations.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Enhancing residents' neonatal resuscitation competency through team-based simulation training: an intervention educational study.BMC medical education · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Neonatal cardiopulmonary arrests are rare but serious events. There is limited information on compliance to best-practice guidelines due to rarity, but deviations can have dire consequences. This research aimed to characterize compliance with and deviations from Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines and their association with teamwork. Methods: We observed Emergency Medical Service (EMS) teams responding to standardized neonatal resuscitation simulations following a precipitous home delivery. A Clinical expert evaluated teamwork during simulations using the Clinical Teamwork Scale (CTS™). A neonatologist evaluated technical performance in blinded video review according to NRP guidelines. We report the types, counts, and severity of observed deviations. Logistic regression tested the association of CTS™ factors with the occurrence of deviations. Results: Forty-five (45) teams of 265 EMS personnel from fire and transport agencies participated in the simulations. Eighty-seven percent (39/45) of teams were rated as having good teamwork according to CTS™. Nearly all teams (44 of 45) delayed or did not perform one or more of the initial steps of dry, warm, or stimulate; delayed bag-valve mask ventilation (BVM); or performed continuous compressions instead of the recommended 3:1 compression-to-ventilation ratio. Logistic regression revealed an 82% ( Conclusion: Drying, warming, and stimulating, and ventilation tailored to the physiologic needs of infants continue to be top priorities in neonatal care for out-of-hospital settings. EMS teamwork is good and higher quality of decision-making appears to decrease the odds of ventilation errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.