Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35607388›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering

Breast image registration for surgery: Insights on material mechanics modeling.

Morgan J Ringel, Winona L Richey, Jon Heiselman, Ma Luo, Ingrid M Meszoely, Michael I Miga

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Morgan J RingelVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, TN USA.
Winona L RicheyVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, TN USA.
Jon HeiselmanVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, TN USA.
Ma LuoVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, TN USA.
Ingrid M MeszoelyVanderbilt University Medical Center, Division of Surgical Oncology, Nashville, TN USA.
Michael I MigaVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, TN USA.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Deformation Corrected Image Guided Laparoscopic Liver SurgeryR01EB027498 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI JARNAGIN, WILLIAM ROBERT, MIGA, MICHAEL IAN · 2019 to 2022
$2.5M
Training Program for Innovative Engineering Research in Surgery and InterventionT32EB021937 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Dario J Englot, Michael Ian Miga · 2016 to 2026
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027498NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB021937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is a common procedure for early-stage breast cancer patients. Supine preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) breast imaging for visualizing tumor location and extent, while not standard for procedural guidance, more closely represents the surgical presentation compared to conventional diagnostic pendant positioning. Optimal utilization for surgical guidance, however, requires a fast and accurate image-to-physical registration from preoperative imaging to intraoperative surgical presentation. In this study, three registration methods were investigated on healthy volunteers' breasts (n=11) with the arm-down position simulating preoperative imaging and arm-up position simulating intraoperative data. The registration methods included: (1) point-based rigid registration using synthetic fiducials, (2) non-rigid biomechanical model-based registration using sparse data, and (3) a data-dense 3D diffeomorphic image-based registration from the Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) repository. The average target registration errors (TRE) were 10.4 ± 2.3, 6.4 ± 1.5, and 2.8 ± 1.3 mm (mean ± standard deviation) and the average fiducial registration errors (FRE) were 7.8 ± 1.7, 2.5 ± 1.1, and 3.1 ± 1.1 mm (mean ± standard deviation) for the point-based rigid, nonrigid biomechanical, and ANTs registrations, respectively. Additionally, common mechanics-based deformation metrics (volume change and anisotropy) were calculated from the ANTs deformation field. The average metrics revealed anisotropic tissue behavior and a statistical difference in volume change between glandular and adipose tissue, suggesting that nonrigid modeling methods may be improved by incorporating material heterogeneity and anisotropy. Overall, registration accuracy significantly improved with increasingly flexible registration methods, which may inform future development of image guidance systems for lumpectomy procedures.

Indexed as

breast cancerdeformable image registrationfinite element modelinglumpectomyregistrationsurgical guidance

Identifiers

PMID35607388
PMCPMC9124453
OpenAlexW4221101607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.