Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35606888›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2022

Effect of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on body composition in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mariana Peixoto Guimarães Ubirajara E Silva de Souza, Nathalia Sernizon Guimarães, Maria Fernanda Brandão de Resende Guimarães, Viviane Angelina de Souza, Adriana Maria Kakehasi

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mariana Peixoto Guimarães Ubirajara E Silva de SouzaPost Graduate Program in Sciences Applied to Adult Health Care, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190 - Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30130-100, Brazil. marianapgus@yahoo.com.br.ORCID 0000-0002-9629-9662
Nathalia Sernizon GuimarãesCollective Health Institute of the Federal University of Bahia, St. Basílio da Gama, no number - Canela, Salvador, Bahia, 40110-040, Brazil.
Maria Fernanda Brandão de Resende GuimarãesPost Graduate Program in Sciences Applied to Adult Health Care, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190 - Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30130-100, Brazil.
Viviane Angelina de SouzaFederal University of Juiz de For a, St. José Lourenço Kelmer, no number -São Pedro, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, 36036-900, Brazil.
Adriana Maria KakehasiPost Graduate Program in Sciences Applied to Adult Health Care, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Prof. Alfredo Balena, 190 - Santa Efigênia, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30130-100, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal de Juiz de Fora · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRheumatoid arthritis (RA) generates an inflammatory profile that predisposes to total and visceral fatty accumulation and reduced fat free mass (FFM). This metabolic disorder contributes to poor functionality, increased cardiovascular risk and higher mortality. This study aimed to address a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the effect of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs) on body composition (BC) of patients with RA.

methodsThe search was conducted at the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Lilacs and grey literature. This investigation was carried until July 2021. Outcomes of interest were total weight, body mass index (BMI), fat mass (FM) and FFM. A meta-analysis comparing these outcomes in RA patients under bDMARD treatment versus controls was performed.

resultsOut of 137 studies reviewed, 18 were selected: fifteen prospective cohorts, two retrospective cohorts, and one cross-sectional study. The studies comprised 1221 patients, 778 on bDMARD treatment and 443 controls, which included RA patients under conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD). No study addressing BC analysis in patients using tsDMARD was found. The mean age and duration of the disease was 56.7 years and 6.77 years, respectively. Ten studies demonstrated a significant increase of total weight in 88.2% of patients and 42.3% for BMI. In studies that analyzed BC by double X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), the increase in total weight and BMI correlated positively to the increase in FFM. The meta-analysis carried out in five studies showed no significant difference of the mean difference for total weight 0.12 kg (95% CI - 5.58, 5.82), BMI 0.08 kg/m

conclusionThis systematic review suggests a possible impact of bDMARDs on BC of RA patients, even though, the meta-analysis carried out in a small part of these studies was not able to confirm significant variation in BC components.

trial registrationPROSPERO code: CRD42020206949.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsBody CompositionCross-Sectional StudiesHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsBody compositionDisease-modifying antirheumatic drugsFat free massRheumatoid arthritisRheumatoid cachexia

Identifiers

PMID35606888
OpenAlexW4281295297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.