Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35606884›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2022

Evolving outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ryan Ruiyang Ling, Kollengode Ramanathan, Jackie Jia Lin Sim, Suei Nee Wong, Ying Chen, Faizan Amin, Shannon M Fernando, Bram Rochwerg, Eddy Fan, Ryan P Barbaro and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ryan Ruiyang Ling *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-8335-7640
Kollengode Ramanathan *Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore. surrkr@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0003-1822-9455
Jackie Jia Lin SimYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0474-6216
Suei Nee WongMedical Resource Team, National University of Singapore Libraries, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-3086-2480
Ying ChenAgency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Faizan AminDepartment of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0365-1194
Shannon M FernandoDivision of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4549-4289
Bram RochwergDepartment of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8293-7061
Eddy FanInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1210-9914
Ryan P BarbaroDivision of Paediatrics Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3645-0359
Graeme MacLarenYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1307-4274
Kiran Shekar *Adult Intensive Care Services, Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1239-7514
Daniel Brodie *Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0813-3145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used extensively for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Reports early in the pandemic suggested that mortality in patients with COVID-19 receiving ECMO was comparable to non-COVID-19-related ARDS. However, subsequent reports suggested that mortality appeared to be increasing over time. Therefore, we conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, to characterise changes in mortality over time and elucidate risk factors for poor outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a meta-analysis (CRD42021271202), searching MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus databases, from 1 December 2019 to 26 January 2022, for studies reporting on mortality among adults with COVID-19 receiving ECMO. We also captured hospital and intensive care unit lengths of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation and ECMO, as well as complications of ECMO. We conducted random-effects meta-analyses, assessed risk of bias of included studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist and evaluated certainty of pooled estimates using GRADE methodology.

resultsOf 4522 citations, we included 52 studies comprising 18,211 patients in the meta-analysis. The pooled mortality rate among patients with COVID-19 requiring ECMO was 48.8% (95% confidence interval 44.8-52.9%, high certainty). Mortality was higher among studies which enrolled patients later in the pandemic as opposed to earlier (1st half 2020: 41.2%, 2nd half 2020: 46.4%, 1st half 2021: 62.0%, 2nd half 2021: 46.5%, interaction p value = 0.0014). Predictors of increased mortality included age, the time of final patient enrolment from 1 January 2020, and the proportion of patients receiving corticosteroids, and reduced duration of ECMO run.

conclusionsThe mortality rate for patients receiving ECMO for COVID-19-related ARDS has increased as the pandemic has progressed. The reasons for this are likely multifactorial; however, as outcomes for these patients evolve, the decision to initiate ECMO should include the best contextual estimate of mortality at the time of ECMO initiation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationRespiratory Distress SyndromeAdultHumansIntensive Care UnitsPandemicsCoronavirus disease 2019Extracorporeal membrane oxygenationMeta-analysisMortalitySevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Identifiers

PMID35606884
PMCPMC9125014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.