Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35606827›Full record

ReviewEpigenetics & chromatin2022

Structural comparisons reveal diverse binding modes between nucleosome assembly proteins and histones.

Jasmita Gill, Anuj Kumar, Amit Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Histone Nuclear Import and Beyond: Multifunctional Roles of Importins.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Histone Chaperone Network Is Highly Conserved inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jasmita Gill *ICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, India.
Anuj Kumar *Molecular Biology Group, ICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India.
Amit SharmaICMR-National Institute of Malaria Research, New Delhi, India. directornimr@gmail.com.
National Institute of Malaria Research · INNational Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nucleosome assembly proteins (NAPs) are histone chaperones that play a central role in facilitating chromatin assembly/disassembly which is of fundamental importance for DNA replication, gene expression regulation, and progression through the cell cycle. In vitro, NAPs bind to the core histones H2A, H2B, H3, H4 and possibly to H1. The NAP family contains well-characterized and dedicated histone chaperone domain called the NAP domain, and the NAP-histone interactions are key to deciphering chromatin assembly. Our comparative structural analysis of the three three-dimensional structures of NAPs from S. cerevisiae, C. elegans, and A. thaliana in complex with the histone H2A-H2B dimer reveals distinct and diverse binding of NAPs with histones. The three NAPs employ distinct surfaces for recognizing the H2A-H2B dimer and vice versa. Though histones are highly conserved across species they display diverse footprints on NAPs. Our analysis indicates that understanding of NAPs and their interaction with histone H2A-H2B remains sparse. Due to divergent knowledge from the current structures analyzed here, investigations into the dynamic nature of NAP-histone interactions are warranted.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyHistonesAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansHistone ChaperonesNucleosomesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeHistone ChaperonesHistonesNucleosomesHistone chaperoneNAPNucleosome assembly proteinStructural analysis

Identifiers

PMID35606827
PMCPMC9128123
OpenAlexW4281400830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.