Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35606751›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2022

Impact of agitation/activation strategies on the antibiofilm potential of sodium hypochlorite/etidronate mixture in vitro.

Ming Cai, Yanling Cai, Ruiqi Yang, Zhezhen Xu, Prasanna Neelakantan, Xi Wei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ming Cai *Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, 56 Lingyuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China.
Yanling Cai *Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, 56 Lingyuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China.
Ruiqi YangDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, 56 Lingyuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China.
Zhezhen XuDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, 56 Lingyuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China.
Prasanna NeelakantanDiscipline of Endodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, The Prince Philip Dental Hospital, 34 Hospital Road, Sai Ying Pun, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong SAR, China. prasanna@hku.hk.
Xi WeiDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Sun Yat-Sen University, 56 Lingyuan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510055, Guangdong, China. weixi@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Stomatology Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the effect of a rotary agitation method or ultrasonically activated irrigation on the antibiofilm effect of a mixture of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and etidronate (1-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate, HEBP) using a dual-species biofilm model in root canal system.

methodsMature dual-species biofilms of Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus gordonii were formed in root canals of mandibular premolars. Teeth were randomly allotted (n = 12) to group 1, XP-endo Finisher (XPF); group 2, ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI); group 3, syringe-and-needle irrigation (SNI). In all groups, canals were instrumented with a rotary instrument (XP-endo Shaper) prior to irrigant agitation/activation. A mixture containing 2.5% NaOCl and 9% HEBP was used throughout the experiment. Bacterial counts from the canal were determined using qPCR before preparation (S1), after preparation (S2), and after final irrigation agitation/activation (S3). Bacterial viability within the dentinal tubules in the coronal, middle and apical root-thirds was quantified using confocal microscopy after Live/Dead staining. The bacterial counts and viability were compared between groups using one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey's tests. Paired t-test was used to compare the bacterial counts within groups.

resultsInstrumentation alone could significantly reduce the microbial counts in all the groups (P < 0.0001). Subsequent agitation/activation resulted in significant microbial reduction only in XPF and UAI (P < 0.05), both of which reduced significantly more microbial counts than SNI (P < 0.05). Live/Dead staining revealed that XPF and UAI showed significantly greater percentage of dead bacteria within the dentinal tubules than SNI in the coronal third (P < 0.05); UAI resulted in the significantly highest percentage of dead bacteria in the middle third (P < 0.05); while there was no significant difference between the groups in the apical third (P > 0.05).

conclusionsWhen using the sodium hypochlorite/etidronate mixture for irrigation, final irrigant agitation/activation with XP-endo Finisher or ultrasonic can improve disinfection of the main root canal space and the dentinal tubules in the coronal third, while ultrasonically activated irrigation appears to exhibit better disinfection within dentinal tubules in the middle third.

Indexed as

Etidronic AcidSodium HypochloriteBiofilmsDental Pulp CavityHumansHypochlorous AcidRoot Canal IrrigantsRoot Canal PreparationTherapeutic IrrigationEtidronic AcidHypochlorous AcidRoot Canal IrrigantsSodium HypochloriteBiofilmDisinfectionEtidronateSodium hypochloriteUltrasonically activated irrigationXP-endo FinisherXP-endo Shaper

Identifiers

PMID35606751
PMCPMC9125931
OpenAlexW4281287461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.