Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35606731›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Digital screening for postnatal depression: mixed methods proof-of-concept study.

Emily Eisner, Shôn Lewis, Charlotte Stockton-Powdrell, Ria Agass, Pauline Whelan, Clare Tower

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04279093 (Digital Assessment of Well-being in New Parents), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04279093 completednot on this map

Digital Assessment of Well-being in New Parents (DAWN-P)

TypeobservationalSponsorEmily EisnerRan2020 to 2020Enrolled23ConditionsPostnatal DepressionArmsNo intervention, but participants will use a smartphone app daily to complete the EPDS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Screening Measures of Perinatal Mental Health and Wellbeing in Fathers: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Emily EisnerDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. emily.eisner@manchester.ac.uk.
Shôn LewisDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Charlotte Stockton-PowdrellDivision of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ria AgassSt Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Rainhill, UK.
Pauline WhelanGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Clare TowerManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression during the postnatal year is prevalent in mothers (17%) and fathers (9%), and suicide is the leading cause of maternal death in this period. Lifelong costs and consequences of untreated postnatal depression (PND) are high due to impacts on infants as well as parents. We aimed to improve access to PND treatment using digital screening. We developed a smartphone app (ClinTouch DAWN-P) that allows parents to monitor their mood daily with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), uploading responses in real-time to a secure server. We evaluated the app's feasibility, acceptability, validity and safety in a proof-of-concept study.

methodsPregnant women (≥ 36 weeks gestation) and partners were recruited from antenatal services and invited to complete daily EPDS assessments via the ClinTouch DAWN-P app until 6 weeks postpartum. Participants completed standard paper-based EPDS at two time points for validity comparisons. We examined app acceptability and usability at 6 weeks postpartum with qualitative interviews, examined using framework analysis, and the abridged Mobile App Rating Scale (convergent mixed methods design).

resultsMost (96%) eligible pregnant women approached were keen to try the app. Participating mothers (n = 15) and partners/fathers (n = 8) found the app easy to use, and 91% continued to use it for the full study period. Overall, 67% of daily app-based assessments were completed, with a history of depression predicting lower app usage. Participants suggested modifications to the app and its deployment to improve usability (e.g., extending the response window and including feedback and parenting advice). The validity of app-based responses was confirmed by high agreement with standard EPDS. App-based and paper-based ratings showed perfect agreement in identifying cases of likely PND. There were no serious adverse events relating to app use.

conclusionsDigital PND screening appears feasible, acceptable, valid and safe. It also benefits from being remotely delivered: we enrolled all participants remotely during the first COVID-19 lockdown. Use of digital screening could address known shortcomings of conventional health visitor-delivered screening such as limited staff time, parental unwillingness to disclose difficulties to a professional, lack of partner/father screening, and language barriers.

trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04279093 ).

Indexed as

COVID-19Depression, PostpartumMobile ApplicationsCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansInfantMaleMothersPregnancyDigital mental healthFramework analysisMaternal mental healthmHealthMixed methodsPostnatal depressionScreeningSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID35606731
PMCPMC9125009
OpenAlexW4281285463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.