Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35606703›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Time trends in social contacts before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONNECT study.

Mélanie Drolet, Aurélie Godbout, Myrto Mondor, Guillaume Béraud, Léa Drolet-Roy, Philippe Lemieux-Mellouki, Alexandre Bureau, Éric Demers, Marie-Claude Boily, Chantal Sauvageau and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Contact behaviour before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: evidence from contact surveys, 2016 to 2017 and 2020 to 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mélanie DroletCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Aurélie GodboutCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Myrto MondorCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Guillaume BéraudDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, 86021, Poitiers, France.
Léa Drolet-RoyCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Philippe Lemieux-MelloukiCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Alexandre BureauLaval University, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Éric DemersCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Claude BoilyMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Chantal SauvageauCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Gaston De SerresCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Niel HensI-BioStat, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Philippe BeutelsCentre for Health Economic Research and Modelling Infectious Diseases, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Benoit DervauxInstitut Pasteur U1167 - RID-AGE - Facteurs de risque et déterminants moléculaires des maladies liées au vieillissement, Univ Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, 59000, Lille, France.
Marc BrissonCentre de Recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada. marc.brisson@crchudequebec.ulaval.ca.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries, including Canada, have adopted unprecedented physical distancing measures such as closure of schools and non-essential businesses, and restrictions on gatherings and household visits. We described time trends in social contacts for the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods in Quebec, Canada.

methodsCONNECT is a population-based study of social contacts conducted shortly before (2018/2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020 - February 2021), using the same methodology for both periods. We recruited participants by random digit dialing and collected data by self-administered web-based questionnaires. Questionnaires documented socio-demographic characteristics and social contacts for two assigned days. A contact was defined as a two-way conversation at a distance ≤ 2 m or as a physical contact, irrespective of masking. We used weighted generalized linear models with a Poisson distribution and robust variance (taking possible overdispersion into account) to compare the mean number of social contacts over time and by socio-demographic characteristics.

resultsA total of 1291 and 5516 Quebecers completed the study before and during the pandemic, respectively. Contacts significantly decreased from a mean of 8 contacts/day prior to the pandemic to 3 contacts/day during the spring 2020 lockdown. Contacts remained lower than the pre-COVID period thereafter (lowest = 3 contacts/day during the Christmas 2020/2021 holidays, highest = 5 in September 2020). Contacts at work, during leisure activities/in other locations, and at home with visitors showed the greatest decreases since the beginning of the pandemic. All sociodemographic subgroups showed significant decreases of contacts since the beginning of the pandemic. The mixing matrices illustrated the impact of public health measures (e.g. school closure, gathering restrictions) with fewer contacts between children/teenagers and fewer contacts outside of the three main diagonals of contacts between same-age partners/siblings and between children and their parents.

conclusionPhysical distancing measures in Quebec significantly decreased social contacts, which most likely mitigated the spread of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Physical DistancingAdolescentChildCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsQuebecSchoolsCOVID-19Infectious diseaseMathematical modelingPublic healthSocial contactsSocial distancing measures

Identifiers

PMID35606703
PMCPMC9125550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.