Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35606700›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2022

Patients with gastroenteric tumor after upper abdominal surgery were more likely to require rescue analgesia than lower abdominal surgery.

Ting-Ting Li, Quan-Yuan Chang, Liu-Lin Xiong, Yan-Jun Chen, Qi-Jun Li, Fei Liu, Ting-Hua Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ting-Ting Li *Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Quan-Yuan ChangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China.
Liu-Lin XiongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Yan-Jun ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Qi-Jun LiTraditional Chinese Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China.
Fei Liu *Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. 30333870@qq.com.
Ting-Hua Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Neurological Disease, West China Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. Wangth_email@163.com.
Sichuan University · CNSouthwest Medical University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNZunyi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo find out the reasons why patients still need to use rescue analgesics frequently after gastrointestinal tumor surgery under the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (IV-PCA), and the different abdominal surgery patients using the difference of analgesics.

methodsA total of 970 patients underwent abdominal operation for gastrointestinal tumors were included. According whether patients used dezocine frequently for rescue analgesics within 2 days after surgery, they assigned into two groups: RAN group (Patients who did not frequently use rescue analgesia, 406 cases) and RAY group (Patients who frequently used rescue analgesia, 564 cases). The data collected included patient's characteristics, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS), nausea and vomiting (PONV), and postoperative activity recovery time.

resultsNo differences were observed in the baseline characteristics. Compared with the RAN group, patients in the RAY group had a higher proportion of open surgery, upper abdominal surgery, VAS score at rest on the first 2 days after surgery and PONV, and a slower recovery of most postoperative activities. Under the current use of IV-PCA background, the proportion of rescue analgesics used by patients undergoing laparotomy and upper abdominal surgery was as high as 64.33% and 72.8%, respectively. Regression analysis showed that open surgery (vs laparoscopic surgery: OR: 2.288, 95% CI: 1.650-3.172) and the location of the tumor in the upper abdomen (vs lower abdominal tumor: OR: 2.738, 95% CI: 2.034-3.686) were influential factors for frequent salvage administration.

conclusionsIn our patient population, with our IV-PCA prescription for postoperative pain control, patient who underwent open upper abdominal surgery required more rescue postoperative analgesia.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPostoperative Nausea and VomitingAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidHumansPostoperative PainAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAbdominal operationDezocineEmergency analgesiaPostoperative pain

Identifiers

PMID35606700
PMCPMC9125846
OpenAlexW4281293643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.