Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35606654›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2022

Conventional MRI features can predict the molecular subtype of adult grade 2-3 intracranial diffuse gliomas.

Arian Lasocki, Michael E Buckland, Katharine J Drummond, Heng Wei, Jing Xie, Michael Christie, Andrew Neal, Frank Gaillard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beyond the visual T2-FLAIR mismatch: quantitative imaging markers of IDH mutation in Gliomas-A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arian LasockiDepartment of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8176-3015
Michael E BucklandDepartment of Neuropathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-6471
Katharine J DrummondDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8152-2120
Heng WeiDepartment of Neuropathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2944-031X
Jing XieCentre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6694-3587
Michael ChristieDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8006-6832
Andrew NealDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9251-5471
Frank GaillardDepartment of Radiology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2382-872X

Funding

Peter MacCallum Cancer Foundation 20187/RANZCR/010Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists 20187/RANZCR/010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMolecular biomarkers are important for classifying intracranial gliomas, prompting research into correlating imaging with genotype ("radiogenomics"). A limitation of the existing radiogenomics literature is the paucity of studies specifically characterizing grade 2-3 gliomas into the three key molecular subtypes. Our study investigated the accuracy of multiple different conventional MRI features for genotype prediction.

methodsGrade 2-3 gliomas diagnosed between 2007 and 2013 were identified. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed nine conventional MRI features. Features with better inter-observer agreement (κ ≥ 0.6) proceeded to consensus assessment. MRI features were correlated with genotype, classified as IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted (IDH

resultsOne hundred nineteen patients were included. T2-FLAIR mismatch (stratified as > 50%, 25-50%, or < 25%) was the most predictive feature across genotypes (p < 0.001). All 30 tumors with > 50% mismatch were IDH

conclusionT2-FLAIR mismatch strongly predicts IDH

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaGliomaAdultBiomarkersHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingMutationNecrosisBiomarkersIsocitrate DehydrogenaseGlioblastomaGliomaMRIRadiogenomicsT2-FLAIR mismatch

Identifiers

PMID35606654
PMCPMC9643259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.