Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35606518›Full record

ArticleNPJ vaccines2022

Adjuvanting a subunit SARS-CoV-2 vaccine with clinically relevant adjuvants induces durable protection in mice.

Lilit Grigoryan, Audrey Lee, Alexandra C Walls, Lilin Lai, Benjamin Franco, Prabhu S Arunachalam, Yupeng Feng, Wei Luo, Abigail Vanderheiden, Katharine Floyd and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Improving the immunogenicity ofFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. From sequence to scaffold: Computational design of protein nanoparticle vaccines from AlphaFold2-predicted building blocks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Lilit Grigoryan *Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Audrey Lee *Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Alexandra C WallsDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lilin LaiEmory Vaccine Center, 954 Gatewood Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Benjamin FrancoVeterinary Service Center, Department of Comparative Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Prabhu S ArunachalamInstitute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0090-5689
Yupeng FengInstitute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-2787
Wei LuoInstitute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Abigail VanderheidenEmory Vaccine Center, 954 Gatewood Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Katharine FloydEmory Vaccine Center, 954 Gatewood Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
Samuel WrennDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Deleah PettieDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marcos C MirandaDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Elizabeth KeplDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Rashmi RavichandranDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Claire SydemanDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Natalie BrunetteDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0558-5584
Michael MurphyDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brooke FialaDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lauren CarterDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Robert L CoffmanDynavax Technologies Corporation, Emeryville, CA, USA.
David NovackDynavax Technologies Corporation, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Harry KleanthousBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA.
Derek T O'HaganGSK, Rockville, MD, USA.
Robbert van der MostGSK, Rixensart, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3065-6946
Jason S McLellanDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
Mehul SutharEmory Vaccine Center, 954 Gatewood Road, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA.
David VeeslerDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Neil P KingDepartment of Biochemistry and Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2978-4692
Bali PulendranInstitute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. bpulend@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6517-4333
University of Washington · USStanford University · USEmory Healthcare · USDynavax Technologies (United States) · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USGates Foundation · USGlaxoSmithKline (Belgium) · BEGlaxoSmithKline (United States) · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Vaccine against HCV in nonhuman primatesU19AI159840 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FOUNG, STEVEN · 2021 to 2025
$11.9M
MICROBES, DENDRITIC CELL SUBSETS AND T-CELL IMMUNITYR01AI048638 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PULENDRAN, BALI · 2001 to 2024
$4.5M
Understanding the Role of Mucosal Antigen Presenting Cells in Regulating Immune ResponseR37AI048638 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PULENDRAN, BALI · 2009 to 2018
$4.0M
Polarizing T Cell Responses in vivo With Dendritic CellsR37DK057665 · NIDDK · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI PULENDRAN, BALI · 2010 to 2019
$3.9M
Gates Foundation INV-018675NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI048638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adjuvants enhance the magnitude and the durability of the immune response to vaccines. However, there is a paucity of comparative studies on the nature of the immune responses stimulated by leading adjuvant candidates. In this study, we compared five clinically relevant adjuvants in mice-alum, AS03 (a squalene-based adjuvant supplemented with α-tocopherol), AS37 (a TLR7 ligand emulsified in alum), CpG1018 (a TLR9 ligand emulsified in alum), O/W 1849101 (a squalene-based adjuvant)-for their capacity to stimulate immune responses when combined with a subunit vaccine under clinical development. We found that all four of the adjuvant candidates surpassed alum with respect to their capacity to induce enhanced and durable antigen-specific antibody responses. The TLR-agonist-based adjuvants CpG1018 (TLR9) and AS37 (TLR7) induced Th1-skewed CD4+ T cell responses, while alum, O/W, and AS03 induced a balanced Th1/Th2 response. Consistent with this, adjuvants induced distinct patterns of early innate responses. Finally, vaccines adjuvanted with AS03, AS37, and CpG1018/alum-induced durable neutralizing-antibody responses and significant protection against the B.1.351 variant 7 months following immunization. These results, together with our recent results from an identical study in non-human primates (NHPs), provide a comparative benchmarking of five clinically relevant vaccine adjuvants for their capacity to stimulate immunity to a subunit vaccine, demonstrating the capacity of adjuvanted SARS-CoV-2 subunit vaccines to provide durable protection against the B.1.351 variant. Furthermore, these results reveal differences between the widely-used C57BL/6 mouse strain and NHP animal models, highlighting the importance of species selection for future vaccine and adjuvant studies.

Identifiers

PMID35606518
PMCPMC9126867
OpenAlexW4281293011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.