Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35606474›Full record

ReviewPsicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS2022

Review of suicidal ideation during pregnancy: risk factors, prevalence, assessment instruments and consequences.

Pilar Carolina Castelao Legazpi, María F Rodríguez-Muñoz, María Eugenia Olivares-Crespo, Nuria Izquierdo-Méndez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pilar Carolina Castelao LegazpiDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
María F Rodríguez-MuñozDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain. mfrodriguez@psi.uned.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1908-0405
María Eugenia Olivares-CrespoDeparment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Clínico San Carlos & Faculty of Medicine Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Nuria Izquierdo-MéndezDeparment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Clínico San Carlos & Faculty of Medicine Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancy is a period when women are particularly vulnerable to suicidal ideation and a great opportunity for suicide risk prevention.

aimsThis study aimed to establish a comprehensive understanding of suicidal ideation prevalence, risk factors, screening tools, consequences and management during pregnancy.

methodA literature search was performed in MEDLINE and PsycInfo databases from 2016 to 2021. A narrative synthesis of the literature and a critical overview of the current issues/questions to be addressed within the topic of suicidal ideation during pregnancy was performed.

resultsThe prevalence of suicidal ideation during pregnancy was between 2.73 and 18% internationally. The risk factors identified were major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, difficulties with sleep, previous suicide attempts, high rumination, low incomes, being black, being young, low educational level, partner violence, having poor support, food insecurity, history of child abuse, high obstetric risk, multiparity, previous induced abortion and exposure to tobacco or human immunodeficiency virus diagnosis. The screening tools used for suicidal ideation during pregnancy were item 10 of the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale and item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire. Results showed that suicidal ideation during pregnancy is associated with poor cognitive development in children and low birth weight. No case management studies on suicidal ideation were found. LIMITATIONS: The main limitation of the available studies was the lack of articles with a high degree of methodological rigour on this subject.

conclusionsThis narrative review is a state-of-the-art paper about suicidal ideation during pregnancy. Further research is needed, and researchers should carry out systematic reviews and meta-analyses, leading to Clinical Practice Guidelines in this area. This effort would improve our evidence-based practice in Perinatal Psychology and prevent associated suicidal behaviour.

Indexed as

PregnancyPrevalencePreventionRisk factorsSuicidal ideation

Identifiers

PMID35606474
PMCPMC9127017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.