Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35606210›Full record

ArticleHearing research2022

Round window stimulation with an interface coupler demonstrates proof of concept.

Darcy L Frear, Hideko Heidi Nakajima

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 93% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Darcy L FrearSpeech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: dlfrear@gmail.com.
Hideko Heidi NakajimaSpeech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology Program, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA; Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, MA, USA. Electronic address: heidi_nakajima@meei.harvard.edu.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

Mechanics of Human Middle & Inner Ear: Basic Science & Clinical ApplicationR01DC013303 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI NAKAJIMA, HIDEKO HEIDI · 2013 to 2024
$4.5M
Dynamin function in pancreatic beta-cell autophagyR01DK133326 · NIDDK · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI LOU, XUELIN · 2022 to 2024
$1.2M
Improving round window stimulation via moldable coupler and impedance modelingF31DC015911 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI FREAR, DARCY · 2016 to 2017
$68k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC015911NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013303NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK133326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

hypothesisTo mechanically stimulate the round window (RW) membrane, an actuator with an interface coupler (IC) has the potential to improve sound transmission to the cochlea as compared to the most used RW stimulation device implanted today. If a proof-of-concept IC prototype shows promise as compared the most common method for RW stimulation, there is potential that future design development of an IC will be worthwhile.

backgroundA variety of hearing pathologies resulting in mixed and conductive hearing loss can be addressed by mechanically stimulating the RW to transmit sound to the cochlea. The most common method for RW stimulation is with the floating mass transducer (FMT, Med-El). However, the FMT suffers poor sound transmission and unreliable device positioning. The dynamic range and bandwidth of the FMT as a RW stimulator is limited because the entire FMT needs freedom to vibrate. Thus the FMT has difficulty overcoming its own inertia and it cannot be stabilized in a manner that may limit its motion. Here we test an idea of using a generic actuator that vibrates on one side while stationary and held stable on the other (unlike the FMT), and coupling the actuator vibration to the RW membrane with a proof-of-concept IC designed to safely transmit sound to the cochlea. We determine if this proof-of-concept IC can perform as well or better than the FMT in one specimen. If so, further developments of the IC would be worthwhile.

methodsRW sound transmission comparison was made between an ideally implanted FMT and a proof-of-concept IC prototype driven by a piezoelectric stack actuator with vibrating tip in a fresh human temporal bone. Velocities of stapes, FMT, and IC actuator were measured with laser Doppler vibrometry to determine bandwidth, linearity, and dynamic range of cochlear sound transmission.

resultsStimulation with proof-of-concept prototype of the IC provided increased sound transmission, more linear output for larger dynamic range, and wider frequency range as compared to the FMT. This experiment demonstrates the potential of the IC concept to improve performance, and that it merits further development. However, it was challenging to stabilize the coupling between an external actuator and the proof-of-concept IC prototype. Thus, although we were successful in showing that this IC concept has promise, major design improvements and developments are required in the future.

conclusionsWe demonstrated that the proof-of-concept IC prototype driven with a tip connected to a piezoelectric stack actuator can stimulate the RW membrane with improved acoustic performance as compared to the FMT in one specimen. This study demonstrated proof of concept: that the idea of an IC for sound transmission to the cochlea through the RW has potential, and that it would be worthwhile to pursue the IC idea with further developments. This idea has the potential to provide robust sound transmission to the cochlea via the RW while preventing possible trauma to the cochlea. We also learned that critical design improvements are necessary because coupling the generic external actuator to the IC was challenging. A possible future IC design is to integrate a piezoelectric actuator permanently to the IC, allowing only the soft balloon membrane of the IC to vibrate the RW while the rest of the exterior housing of the combined IC (with actuator) would not vibrate and would be stabilized in a fixed manner.

Indexed as

Ossicular ProsthesisRound Window, EarAcoustic StimulationHumansIncusStapesTemporal BoneVibrationactuatorconductive hearing lossimplantmiddle-ear prosthesisround windowRound window stimulation

Identifiers

PMID35606210
PMCPMC11887941
OpenAlexW4229048409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.