Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35606120›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of family medicine

Lung Ultrasound Performed by Primary Care Physicians for Clinically Suspected Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Contreras, Antonio Calvo-Cebrián, Juncal Díaz-Lázaro, Miguel Cruz-Arnés, Fernando León-Vázquez, María Del Carmen Lobón-Agúndez, Francisco Javier Palau-Cuevas, Paloma Henares-García, Fernando Gavilán-Martínez, Sandra Fernández-Plaza and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Contribution of point-of-care ultrasound in the prehospital management of patients with non-trauma acute dyspnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Contreras
Antonio Calvo-Cebrián
Juncal Díaz-Lázaro
Miguel Cruz-Arnés
Fernando León-Vázquez
María Del Carmen Lobón-Agúndez
Francisco Javier Palau-Cuevas
Paloma Henares-García
Fernando Gavilán-Martínez
Sandra Fernández-Plaza
Carmelo Prieto-Zancudo
Empresarios Agrupados · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe investigated whether lung ultrasound (US) performed in primary care is useful and feasible for diagnosing community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) compared with chest radiography, as most previous research has been conducted in hospital settings.

methodsWe undertook a prospective observational cohort study of lung US performed in 12 primary care centers. Patients aged 5 years and older with symptoms suggesting CAP were examined with lung US (by 21 family physicians and 7 primary care pediatricians) and chest radiograph on the same day. We compared lung US findings with the radiologist's chest radiograph report as the reference standard, given that the latter is the most common imaging test performed for suspected CAP in primary care. The physicians had varied previous US experience, but all received a 5-hour lung US training program.

resultsThe study included 82 patients. Compared with chest radiography, positive lung US findings (consolidation measuring >1 cm or a focal/asymmetrical B-lines pattern) showed a sensitivity of 87.8%, a specificity of 58.5%, a positive likelihood-ratio of 2.12, and a negative likelihood-ratio of 0.21. Findings were similar regardless of the physicians' previous US training or experience. We propose a practical algorithm whereby patients having consolidation measuring greater than 1 cm or normal findings on lung US could skip chest radiography, whereas patients with a B-lines pattern without consolidation (given its low specificity) would need chest radiography to ensure appropriate management. Lung US was generally performed in 10 minutes or less.

conclusionPoint-of-care lung US in primary care could be useful for investigating suspected CAP (avoiding chest radiography in most cases) and is likely feasible in daily practice, as short training programs appear sufficient and little time is needed to perform the scan.

Indexed as

Community-Acquired InfectionsPhysicians, Primary CarePneumoniaEmergency Service, HospitalHumansLungPoint-of-Care SystemsProspective StudiesRadiography, ThoracicSensitivity and SpecificityUltrasonographydiagnosislungpneumoniapoint of care systemspractice-based researchprimary health caresensitivity and specificitythoracic radiographyultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35606120
PMCPMC9199040
OpenAlexW4281384906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.