Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35605637›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2022

Effectiveness of CoronaVac in children 3-5 years of age during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron outbreak in Chile.

Alejandro Jara, Eduardo A Undurraga, José R Zubizarreta, Cecilia González, Johanna Acevedo, Alejandra Pizarro, Verónica Vergara, Mario Soto-Marchant, Rosario Gilabert, Juan Carlos Flores and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Update on Omicron variant and its threat to vulnerable populations.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alejandro Jara *Ministry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Eduardo A Undurraga *Escuela de Gobierno, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4425-1253
José R ZubizarretaDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Cecilia GonzálezMinistry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Johanna AcevedoMinistry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Alejandra PizarroMinistry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Verónica VergaraMinistry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Mario Soto-MarchantMinistry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Rosario GilabertMinistry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Juan Carlos FloresFacultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Pamela SuárezMinistry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Paulina LeightonMinistry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Pablo EguigurenMinistry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Juan Carlos RíosMinistry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Jorge FernandezMinistry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Heriberto García-EscorzaMinistry of Health, Santiago, Chile.
Rafael Araos *Ministry of Health, Santiago, Chile. rafaelaraos@udd.cl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8075-0626
Ministry of Health · CLPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLHarvard University · USUniversidad del Desarrollo · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outbreak of the B.1.1.529 lineage of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Omicron) has caused an unprecedented number of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases, including pediatric hospital admissions. Policymakers urgently need evidence of vaccine effectiveness in children to balance the costs and benefits of vaccination campaigns, but, to date, the evidence is sparse. Leveraging a population-based cohort in Chile of 490,694 children aged 3-5 years, we estimated the effectiveness of administering a two-dose schedule, 28 days apart, of Sinovac's inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac). We used inverse probability-weighted survival regression models to estimate hazard ratios of symptomatic COVID-19, hospitalization and admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) for children with complete immunization over non-vaccination, accounting for time-varying vaccination exposure and relevant confounders. The study was conducted between 6 December 2021 and 26 February 2022, during the Omicron outbreak in Chile. The estimated vaccine effectiveness was 38.2% (95% confidence interval (CI), 36.5-39.9) against symptomatic COVID-19, 64.6% (95% CI, 49.6-75.2) against hospitalization and 69.0% (95% CI, 18.6-88.2) against ICU admission. The effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 was modest; however, protection against severe disease was high. These results support vaccination of children aged 3-5 years to prevent severe illness and associated complications and highlight the importance of maintaining layered protections against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesChildChild, PreschoolChileCOVID-19 VaccinesDisease OutbreaksHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35605637
PMCPMC9307483
OpenAlexW4281296929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.