ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2022
Omicron variant receptor-binding domain phylogenetics and molecular dynamics.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Outcomes of Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter 2 Inhibitors (SGLT2I) on Diabetes-Associated Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- An RGD motif on SARS-CoV-2 Spike induces TGF-β signaling and downregulates interferon.Journal of virology · 2025Article
- Outcome of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection depends on genetic background in female mice.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A Nasal Vaccine Candidate, Containing Three Antigenic Regions from SARS-CoV-2, to Induce a Broader Response.Vaccines · 2024Article
- Cooperative and structural relationships of the trimeric Spike with infectivity and antibody escape of the strains Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (BA.2, BA.5, and BQ.1).Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2023Article
- Host immune responses associated with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection result in protection or pathology during reinfection depending on mouse genetic background.Research square · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe investigated the evolutionary relationships, mutations, antigenic epitopes, and structural dynamics of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2, Omicron and other recently evolved variants.
methodsThe RBD of SARS-CoV-2 and its Omicron, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Mu variants were subjected to pairwise sequence matrix evaluation, antigenic epitope prediction, and phylogenetic relationship and structural dynamics analyses.
resultsThe Omicron RBD contained 13-15 amino acid mutations, of which 12 were new and three conserved with other variants. In addition, two mutations found in the Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Mu variants were not found in the Omicron RBD. The ultrametric clustering unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean identified Omicron as a novel monophyletic class, but the neighbor-joining method clustered Omicron with Alpha and Delta variants. In the SARS-CoV-2 RBD, five main antigenic epitopes were predicted, and these epitopes were conserved across all SARS-CoV-2 variants tested. Surprisingly, the additional mutations in the Omicron variant increased the size of the expected antigenic sites in two of these antigenic epitopes. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations revealed higher root-mean-square deviation in the Omicron RBD, greater residue fluctuation at residues 32-42 and 140-160, and increased solvent-accessible surface area.
conclusionsThe Omicron RBD mutations indicate the variant is within a new phylogenetic class of SARS-CoV-2 and significantly impact RBD structure, conformation, and molecular dynamics. However, conserved anticipated antigenic sites may imply partial changes in receptor affinity and response to immune reactions. Omicron RBD binding with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor was suggested to be weaker than the original SARS-CoV-2 binding in MD simulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.