Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35605188›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2022

Post Hoc Analysis of Lorlatinib Intracranial Efficacy and Safety in Patients With

Benjamin J Solomon, Todd M Bauer, Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou, Geoffrey Liu, Hidetoshi Hayashi, Alessandra Bearz, Konstantin Penkov, Yi-Long Wu, Oscar Arrieta, Jacek Jassem and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
18.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in Patients With AdvancedJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Benjamin J SolomonPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3059-5730
Todd M BauerSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN.ORCID 0000-0002-3078-5043
Sai-Hong Ignatius OuUniversity of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-1764-4975
Geoffrey LiuPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Hidetoshi HayashiKindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8787-5587
Alessandra BearzCentro di Riferimento Oncologico, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1020-2338
Konstantin PenkovPrivate Medical Institution Euromedservice, St Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Yi-Long WuGuangdong Lung Cancer Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital and Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3611-0258
Oscar ArrietaInstituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-1164-3779
Jacek JassemMedical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Anna M CalellaPfizer Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Gerson PeltzPfizer Oncology, Groton, CT.
Anna PolliPfizer Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Holger ThurmPfizer Oncology, La Jolla, CA.
Tony MokState Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0002-8251-0551
Pfizer (Italy) · ITPfizer (United States) · USCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITChinese University of Hong Kong · HKGdańsk Medical University · PLGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNInstituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXKindai University · JPPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CASarah Cannon · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLorlatinib significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus crizotinib and showed robust intracranial activity in patients with previously untreated advanced

methodsEligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to first-line lorlatinib (100 mg once daily) or crizotinib (250 mg twice a day); no crossover between treatment arms was permitted. Tumor assessments, including CNS magnetic resonance imaging, were performed at screening and then at 8-week intervals. Regular assessments of patient-reported outcomes were conducted.

resultsPFS by blinded independent central review was improved with lorlatinib versus crizotinib in patients with and without brain metastases at baseline (12-month PFS rates: 78%

conclusionFirst-line lorlatinib improved PFS outcomes and reduced CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with advanced

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsAminopyridinesAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCrizotinibHumansLactamsLactams, MacrocyclicProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazolesQuality of LifeAminopyridinesAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCrizotinibLactamsLactams, MacrocycliclorlatinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrazoles

Identifiers

PMID35605188
PMCPMC9622589
OpenAlexW4281289792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.