ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2022
A Kinematic Data-Driven Approach to Differentiate Involuntary Choreic Movements in Individuals With Neurological Conditions.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of instrumented assessments for upper limb function in cerebral palsy: current limitations and future directions.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2024Pooled it
- Advancing Wearable-Based Upper-Limb Stroke Recovery Assessment to the Clinic: A Comparison of Movement Segmentation Strategies.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
- Integrating Digital and Ancillary Technologies in the Modern Clinical Evaluation of Chorea.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Understanding voluntary human movement variability through data-driven segmentation and clustering.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe ability to differentiate similar choreic involuntary movements could lay the groundwork for the development of a minimally-invasive screening tool for their etiology and provide in-depth understandings of pathophysiology. As a first step, we investigate kinematic differences between Huntington's disease (HD) chorea and Parkinson's disease (PD) choreic levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID), which have distinct pathological causes yet share a great kinematic resemblance.
methodsTwenty subjects with HD and ten subjects with PD stood with both upper limbs in front of them for approximately 60 seconds. The three-dimensional velocity time-series of involuntary movements of both hands were segmented into one-dimensional sub-movements abutted by velocity zero-crossings. A combination of unsupervised and supervised machine learning algorithms was employed to automatically select data features extracted from sub-movements and distinguish the two types of involuntary choreic movements.
resultsThe trained model was able to accurately classify chorea vs. LID with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve of 99.5%. A set of important features contributing to the construction of the classification model were identified and investigated.
conclusionThe trained model may serve as a tool for the automatic identification of different types of involuntary choreic movements, enabling continuous monitoring and personalized treatment for patients in various clinical settings. SIGNIFICANCE: The results provide insights into kinematic characteristics of HD chorea and PD LID, which is the first step towards an improved general understanding of involuntary choreic movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.