Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35604952›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Measuring the unknown: An estimator and simulation study for assessing case reporting during epidemics.

Christopher I Jarvis, Amy Gimma, Flavio Finger, Tim P Morris, Jennifer A Thompson, Olivier le Polain de Waroux, W John Edmunds, Sebastian Funk, Thibaut Jombart

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher I JarvisDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0812-2446
Amy GimmaDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2645-7212
Flavio FingerDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8613-5170
Tim P MorrisMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5850-3610
Jennifer A ThompsonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3068-3952
Olivier le Polain de WarouxCentre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3458-2945
W John EdmundsDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9179-2917
Sebastian FunkDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2842-3406
Thibaut JombartDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2226-8692
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_UU_12023/21Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/29Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fraction of cases reported, known as 'reporting', is a key performance indicator in an outbreak response, and an essential factor to consider when modelling epidemics and assessing their impact on populations. Unfortunately, its estimation is inherently difficult, as it relates to the part of an epidemic which is, by definition, not observed. We introduce a simple statistical method for estimating reporting, initially developed for the response to Ebola in Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), 2018-2020. This approach uses transmission chain data typically gathered through case investigation and contact tracing, and uses the proportion of investigated cases with a known, reported infector as a proxy for reporting. Using simulated epidemics, we study how this method performs for different outbreak sizes and reporting levels. Results suggest that our method has low bias, reasonable precision, and despite sub-optimal coverage, usually provides estimates within close range (5-10%) of the true value. Being fast and simple, this method could be useful for estimating reporting in real-time in settings where person-to-person transmission is the main driver of the epidemic, and where case investigation is routinely performed as part of surveillance and contact tracing activities.

Indexed as

EpidemicsHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaContact TracingDemocratic Republic of the CongoDisease OutbreaksHumans

Identifiers

PMID35604952
PMCPMC9166360
OpenAlexW4281385030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.