Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35604951›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Medical empathy in medical students in Madrid: A proposal for empathy level cut-off points for Spain.

José Manuel Blanco Canseco, Augusto Blanco Alfonso, Fernando Caballero Martínez, María Magdalena Hawkins Solís, Teresa Fernández Agulló, Lourdes Lledó García, Antonio López Román, Antonio Piñas Mesa, Elena Maria Vara Ameigeiras, Diana Monge Martín

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

José Manuel Blanco CansecoSchool of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.
Augusto Blanco AlfonsoReina Victoria Healthcare Centre, School of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Fernando Caballero MartínezDean School of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.
María Magdalena Hawkins SolísSchool of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Teresa Fernández AgullóFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Lourdes Lledó GarcíaDean Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5387-6792
Antonio López RománSchool of Medicine, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio Piñas MesaSchool of Medicine, Universidad CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Spain.
Elena Maria Vara AmeigeirasSchool of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Diana Monge MartínSchool of Medicine, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3593-1820
Universidad Francisco de Vitoria · ESUniversidad Alfonso X el Sabio · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Alcalá · ESUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversidad San Pablo CEU · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates the degree of empathy among medical students and its influencing factors at three critical moments of their degree studies (beginning of first year and end of third and sixth years) as well as establishes low-, medium-, and high-empathy cut-off points to obtain valid and reliable results that can be extrapolated to the general population. This cross-sectional study of the eight (public and private) medical schools in the province of Madrid, used an electronic questionnaire with the Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE), Medical Student Well-Being Index, and other independent characteristics as measuring instruments. Of the 2,264 student participants, 1,679 (74.0%) were women, with a 50.7% participation rate. No significant differences were found in empathy levels by academic year. Regarding range, percentile and cut-off point tables were established to identify students with high, medium, and low empathy levels. Women (p<0.001), volunteer workers (p<0.001), and those preferring general specialties (internal medicine, psychiatry, pediatrics, or family medicine) scored higher on the JSE (p<0.02). Moreover, 41.6% presented high level of psychological distress. Women reported a lower well-being level and a higher risk of psychological distress (p = 0.004). In sum, the empathy of medical students in Madrid did not differ among the three critical moments of their university studies. The established cut-off points could be taken into account when accessing the medical degree and identifying students with low levels of empathy to implement curricular interventions to rectify this perceived deficiency. There was a high percentage of medical students with high levels of psychological distress.

Indexed as

EmpathyStudents, MedicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSchools, MedicalSpainSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35604951
PMCPMC9126362
OpenAlexW4281295777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.