Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35604933›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

A genome-scale metabolic model of Cupriavidus necator H16 integrated with TraDIS and transcriptomic data reveals metabolic insights for biotechnological applications.

Nicole Pearcy, Marco Garavaglia, Thomas Millat, James P Gilbert, Yoseb Song, Hassan Hartman, Craig Woods, Claudio Tomi-Andrino, Rajesh Reddy Bommareddy, Byung-Kwan Cho and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mixotrophy for carbon-conserving waste upcycling.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The energy metabolism ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Stable Platform for Mevalonate Bioproduction from COACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicole PearcySchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8872-6436
Marco GaravagliaSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0201-3289
Thomas MillatSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5023-4142
James P GilbertSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2294-3459
Yoseb SongDepartment of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Hassan HartmanSchool of Biological & Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0019-1364
Craig WoodsSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3583-9730
Claudio Tomi-AndrinoSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3611-2130
Rajesh Reddy BommareddySchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3071-3453
Byung-Kwan ChoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4788-4184
David A FellSchool of Biological & Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6669-2247
Mark PoolmanSchool of Biological & Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
John R KingSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6228-8375
Klaus WinzerSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Jamie TwycrossSchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1684-0886
Nigel P MintonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
University of Nottingham · GBOxford Brookes University · GBKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L013940/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploiting biological processes to recycle renewable carbon into high value platform chemicals provides a sustainable and greener alternative to current reliance on petrochemicals. In this regard Cupriavidus necator H16 represents a particularly promising microbial chassis due to its ability to grow on a wide range of low-cost feedstocks, including the waste gas carbon dioxide, whilst also naturally producing large quantities of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) during nutrient-limited conditions. Understanding the complex metabolic behaviour of this bacterium is a prerequisite for the design of successful engineering strategies for optimising product yields. We present a genome-scale metabolic model (GSM) of C. necator H16 (denoted iCN1361), which is directly constructed from the BioCyc database to improve the readability and reusability of the model. After the initial automated construction, we have performed extensive curation and both theoretical and experimental validation. By carrying out a genome-wide essentiality screening using a Transposon-directed Insertion site Sequencing (TraDIS) approach, we showed that the model could predict gene knockout phenotypes with a high level of accuracy. Importantly, we indicate how experimental and computational predictions can be used to improve model structure and, thus, model accuracy as well as to evaluate potential false positives identified in the experiments. Finally, by integrating transcriptomics data with iCN1361 we create a condition-specific model, which, importantly, better reflects PHB production in C. necator H16. Observed changes in the omics data and in-silico-estimated alterations in fluxes were then used to predict the regulatory control of key cellular processes. The results presented demonstrate that iCN1361 is a valuable tool for unravelling the system-level metabolic behaviour of C. necator H16 and can provide useful insights for designing metabolic engineering strategies.

Indexed as

Cupriavidus necatorBiotechnologyCarbon DioxideMetabolic EngineeringTranscriptomeCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID35604933
PMCPMC9166356
OpenAlexW4281382860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.