Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35604791›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2022

Multimodal Tandem Mass Spectrometry Techniques for the Analysis of Phosphopeptides.

Johanna Paris, Alina Theisen, Bryan P Marzullo, Anisha Haris, Tomos E Morgan, Mark P Barrow, John O'Hara, Peter B O'Connor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Johanna ParisDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Alina TheisenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Bryan P MarzulloDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Anisha HarisDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Tomos E MorganDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Mark P BarrowDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6474-5357
John O'HaraUCB, 216 Bath Road, Slough SL1 3WE, United Kingdom.
Peter B O'ConnorDepartment of Chemistry, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6588-6274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collisionally activated dissociation (CAD), infrared multiphoton dissociation (IRMPD), ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD), electron capture dissociation and electron detachment dissociation (EDD) experiments were conducted on a set of phosphopeptides, in a Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometer. The fragmentation patterns were compared and varied according to the fragmentation mechanisms and the composition of the peptides. CAD and IRMPD produced similar fragmentation profiles of the phosphopeptides, while UVPD produced a large number of complementary fragments. Electron-based dissociation techniques displayed lower fragmentation efficiencies, despite retaining the labile phosphate group, and drastically different fragmentation profiles. EDD produced complex spectra whose interpretation proved challenging.

Indexed as

PhosphopeptidesTandem Mass SpectrometryCyclotronsElectronsFourier AnalysisPhosphopeptidescharacterizationcollision activated dissociationelectron capture dissociationelectron detachment dissociationfragmentationinfrared multiphoton dissociationphosphopeptideultraviolet photodissociation

Identifiers

PMID35604791
PMCPMC9264387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.