Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35604764›Full record

Trial reportGut microbes

Species- and strain-level assessment using

Alfonso Benítez-Páez, Annick V Hartstra, Max Nieuwdorp, Yolanda Sanz

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbial genomics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Advances in diagnostic assays forFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  12. The Next Generation Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: To Transplant Bacteria or Virome.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alfonso Benítez-PáezMicrobial Ecology, Nutrition & Health Research Unit, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology, Spanish National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Paterna-Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5707-4340
Annick V HartstraDepartment of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Max NieuwdorpDepartment of Internal and Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yolanda SanzMicrobial Ecology, Nutrition & Health Research Unit, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology, Spanish National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Paterna-Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1615-1976
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is currently used for treating

Indexed as

Fecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetabolic SyndromeBacteriaFecesHumansNucleotidesNucleotidesgut microbiotaMinIONNanopore sequencingrrn operonsingle-nucleotide variationspecies engraftmentspecies-level resolution

Identifiers

PMID35604764
PMCPMC9132484
OpenAlexW4281392567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.