Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35604760›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2022

Adolescent Health Promotion Interventions Using Well-Care Visits and a Smartphone Cognitive Behavioral Therapy App: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Shinichiro Nagamitsu, Ayako Kanie, Kazumi Sakashita, Ryoichi Sakuta, Ayumi Okada, Kencho Matsuura, Masaya Ito, Akiko Katayanagi, Takashi Katayama, Ryoko Otani and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Shinichiro NagamitsuDepartment of Pediatrics, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7156-6050
Ayako KanieNational Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8480-7001
Kazumi SakashitaDepartment of Interdisciplinary Medicine, National Center for Child Health and Development, Setagaya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4588-8221
Ryoichi SakutaChild Development and Psychosomatic Medicine Center, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5444-0568
Ayumi OkadaDepartment of Pediatrics, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9414-1650
Kencho MatsuuraDepartment of Nursing, Fukuoka Prefectural University, Tagawa, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8607-4024
Masaya ItoNational Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-9733
Akiko KatayanagiNational Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1417-9801
Takashi KatayamaLife2Bits, Shibuya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0603-395X
Ryoko OtaniChild Development and Psychosomatic Medicine Center, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0668-6838
Tasuku KitajimaChild Development and Psychosomatic Medicine Center, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3333-7139
Naoki MatsubaraChild Development and Psychosomatic Medicine Center, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4233-7723
Takeshi InoueChild Development and Psychosomatic Medicine Center, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7262-0482
Chie TanakaDepartment of Pediatrics, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3920-4986
Chikako FujiiDepartment of Pediatrics, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0167-9065
Yoshie ShigeyasuDepartment of Pediatrics, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2469-7637
Ryuta IshiiDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0326-7299
Sayaka SakaiDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6264-5902
Michiko MatsuokaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7481-9305
Tatsuyuki KakumaBiostatistics Center, Kurume University, Kurume, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3713-3099
Yushiro YamashitaDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8677-3183
Masaru HorikoshiNational Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Kodaira, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9336-8813
Kurume University · JPDokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center · JPNational Center of Neurology and Psychiatry · JPOkayama University · JPFukuoka Prefectural University · JPJapan Lifeline (Japan) · JPNational Center For Child Health and Development · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescent health promotion is important in preventing risk behaviors and improving mental health. Health promotion during adolescence has been shown to contribute to the prevention of late onset of the mental health disease. However, scalable interventions have not been established yet.

objectiveThis study was designed to test the efficacy of two adolescent health promotion interventions: a well-care visit (WCV) with a risk assessment interview and counseling and self-monitoring with a smartphone cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) app. Our hypothesis was that participants who had received both WCV and the CBT app would have better outcomes than those who had received only WCV or those who had not received any intervention. We conducted a prospective multi-institutional randomized controlled trial.

methodsParticipants were 217 adolescents aged 13-18 years. They were randomly divided into two intervention groups (WCV group and WCV with CBT app group) and a nonintervention group. WCV comprised a standardized physical examination along with a structured interview and counseling for youth risk assessment, which was designed with reference to the Guideline for Health Supervision of Adolescents of Bright Futures. A smartphone-based CBT program was developed based on the CBT approach. The CBT app comprised a 1-week psychoeducation component and a 1-week self-monitoring component. During the CBT program, participants created several self-monitoring sheets based on the CBT model with five window panels: event, thoughts, feelings, body response, and actions. The primary outcome was the change in scores for depressive symptoms. Secondary outcomes included changes in scores for self-esteem, quality of life, self-monitoring, and an adolescent health promotion scale. These outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 2, and 4 months after baseline. The exploratory outcome was the presence of suicidal ideation during the observation period. Intervention effects were estimated using mixed effect models.

resultsIn total, 94% (204/217) of the participants completed the 4-month evaluation. Both intervention groups showed a significant effect in the form of reduced scores for depressive symptoms at 1 month in high school students; however, these effects were not observed at 2 and 4 months. The intervention effect was significantly more predominant in those scoring above cutoff for depressive symptoms. There was significantly less suicidal ideation in the intervention groups. As for secondary outcomes, there was significant increase in health promotion scale scores at the 4-month follow-up among junior high school students in the WCV group. Moreover, the CBT app was significantly effective in terms of obtaining self-monitoring skills and reducing depressive symptoms.

conclusionsAlthough adolescent health promotion interventions may have short-term benefits, the frequency of WCV and further revision of the CBT app should be considered to evaluate long-term effectiveness.

trial registrationUniversity Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry UMIN 000036343; https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041246.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionHealth PromotionMobile ApplicationsAdolescentHumansOffice VisitsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentSmartphoneappcognitive behavioral therapyhealth promotionmobile phonerandomized controlled trialRCTwell-care visit

Identifiers

PMID35604760
PMCPMC9171600
OpenAlexW4245047874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.