Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35604691›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Comparison of Medical Cannabis Use Reported on a Confidential Survey vs Documented in the Electronic Health Record Among Primary Care Patients.

Gwen T Lapham, Theresa E Matson, David S Carrell, Jennifer F Bobb, Casey Luce, Malia M Oliver, Udi E Ghitza, Clarissa Hsu, Kendall C Browne, Ingrid A Binswanger and 9 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cannabis Use and Risk of Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Sinus Surgery.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cannabis Use Among Older Adults.JAMA network open · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Elevated risk of prosthetic infections in cannabis users after shoulder arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Comparing Cannabis Use for Pain to Use for Other Reasons in Primary Care Patients.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Gwen T LaphamKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
Theresa E MatsonKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
David S CarrellKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
Jennifer F BobbKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
Casey LuceKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
Malia M OliverKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
Udi E GhitzaCenter for the Clinical Trials Network, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Clarissa HsuKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle.
Kendall C BrowneCenter of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, Veteran Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Ingrid A BinswangerKaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Denver.
Cynthia I CampbellKaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Oakland.
Andrew J SaxonCenter of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, Veteran Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Ryan VandreyJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gillian L SchauerAddictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, University of Washington, Seattle.
Rosalie Liccardo PaculaPrice School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Michael A HorbergKaiser Permanente Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute, North Bethesda, Maryland.
Steffani R BaileyDepartment of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Erin A McClureMedical University of South Carolina College of Medicine, Charleston.
Katharine A BradleyDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle.
Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of Washington · USCenter for Excellence in Education · USKaiser Permanente · USColorado Permanente Medical Group · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USMedical University of South Carolina · USNational Institutes of Health · USOregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Project-002UG1DA040314 · NIDA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Ingrid A Binswanger, CYNTHIA I CAMPBELL · 2015 to 2026
$34.9M
Technological Innovations for the Remote Monitoring of Smoking in AdolescentsK01DA036739 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MCCLURE, ERIN A · 2014 to 2018
$771k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA036739NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA040314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients who use cannabis for medical reasons may benefit from discussions with clinicians about health risks of cannabis and evidence-based treatment alternatives. However, little is known about the prevalence of medical cannabis use in primary care and how often it is documented in patient electronic health records (EHR). Objective: To estimate the primary care prevalence of medical cannabis use according to confidential patient survey and to compare the prevalence of medical cannabis use documented in the EHR with patient report. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study is a cross-sectional survey performed in a large health system that conducts routine cannabis screening in Washington state where medical and nonmedical cannabis use are legal. Among 108 950 patients who completed routine cannabis screening (between March 28, 2019, and September 12, 2019), 5000 were randomly selected for a confidential survey about cannabis use, using stratified random sampling for frequency of past-year use and patient race and ethnicity. Data were analyzed from November 2020 to December 2021. Exposures: Survey measures of patient-reported past-year cannabis use, medical cannabis use (ie, explicit medical use), and any health reason(s) for use (ie, implicit medical use). Main Outcomes and Measures: Survey data were linked to EHR data in the year before screening. EHR measures included documentation of explicit and/or implicit medical cannabis use. Analyses estimated the primary care prevalence of cannabis use and compared EHR-documented with patient-reported medical cannabis use, accounting for stratified sampling and nonresponse. Results: Overall, 1688 patients responded to the survey (34% response rate; mean [SD] age, 50.7 [17.5] years; 861 female [56%], 1184 White [74%], 1514 non-Hispanic [97%], and 1059 commercially insured [65%]). The primary care prevalence of any past-year patient-reported cannabis use on the survey was 38.8% (95% CI, 31.9%-46.1%), whereas the prevalence of explicit and implicit medical use were 26.5% (95% CI, 21.6%-31.3%) and 35.1% (95% CI, 29.3%-40.8%), respectively. The prevalence of EHR-documented medical cannabis use was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.45%-6.2%). Compared with patient-reported explicit medical use, the sensitivity and specificity of EHR-documented medical cannabis use were 10.0% (95% CI, 4.4%-15.6%) and 97.1% (95% CI, 94.4%-99.8%), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that medical cannabis use is common among primary care patients in a state with legal use, and most use is not documented in the EHR. Patient report of health reasons for cannabis use identifies more medical use compared with explicit questions about medical use.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHealth Care SurveysMedical MarijuanaSelf ReportAdultAgedConfidentialityCross-Sectional StudiesDocumentationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareMedical Marijuana

Identifiers

PMID35604691
PMCPMC9127557
OpenAlexW4281384457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.