ArticleJAMA network open2022
Comparison of Medical Cannabis Use Reported on a Confidential Survey vs Documented in the Electronic Health Record Among Primary Care Patients.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of statewide substance use disorder prevalence estimates from survey data vs electronic health record data.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2026Article
- Anticipated Stigma in Nursing: A Concept Analysis Informed by Cannabis Use Disclosure.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Review
- Community pharmacists' practices and perspectives on deprescribing high-risk psychotropic medicines: National survey findings.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Is Cannabis Dependence Associated with Postoperative Infections in Hand and Wrist Surgeries?Journal of hand surgery global online · 2026Article
- Canadian real-world evidence: observational 24-week outcomes for health care practitioner authorized cannabis.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
- Cannabis use among primary care patients with depression and anxiety disorders: cross-sectional analysis in a large health system in Los Angeles, CA.Journal of cannabis research · 2025Article
- Exploratory analysis of United States-based cannabis product health benefit claims on online marketplaces.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2025Article
- Cannabis Use and Risk of Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Sinus Surgery.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- "It's legal, now what?" development, implementation, and evaluation of interdisciplinary cannabis education for healthcare trainees.Journal of cannabis research · 2025Article
- Why is substance use missing from my patient's problem list? CTN research to advance screening, prevention, and treatment of substance use in primary care.Journal of substance use and addiction treatment · 2025Article
- Cannabis Use Among Older Adults.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Cannabis Use Disorder Among Primary Care Patients with Varying Frequency of Past-Year Cannabis Use.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- NSW cannabis medicines advisory service retrospective enquiry analysis to inform clinical guidance resource development.Neuropsychopharmacology reports · 2025Article
- Discussions of Cannabis Over Patient Portal Secure Messaging: Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- The Cannabis and Health Research Initiative will help integrate medicinal cannabis in healthcare.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- Discriminative validity of a substance use symptom checklist for moderate-severe DSM-5 cannabis use disorder (CUD) in primary care settings.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2024Article
- Cannabis Use Reported by Patients Receiving Primary Care in a Large Health System.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Elevated risk of prosthetic infections in cannabis users after shoulder arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- The role of stigma in cannabis use disclosure: an exploratory study.Harm reduction journal · 2024Article
- Comparing Cannabis Use for Pain to Use for Other Reasons in Primary Care Patients.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
19 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Patients who use cannabis for medical reasons may benefit from discussions with clinicians about health risks of cannabis and evidence-based treatment alternatives. However, little is known about the prevalence of medical cannabis use in primary care and how often it is documented in patient electronic health records (EHR). Objective: To estimate the primary care prevalence of medical cannabis use according to confidential patient survey and to compare the prevalence of medical cannabis use documented in the EHR with patient report. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study is a cross-sectional survey performed in a large health system that conducts routine cannabis screening in Washington state where medical and nonmedical cannabis use are legal. Among 108 950 patients who completed routine cannabis screening (between March 28, 2019, and September 12, 2019), 5000 were randomly selected for a confidential survey about cannabis use, using stratified random sampling for frequency of past-year use and patient race and ethnicity. Data were analyzed from November 2020 to December 2021. Exposures: Survey measures of patient-reported past-year cannabis use, medical cannabis use (ie, explicit medical use), and any health reason(s) for use (ie, implicit medical use). Main Outcomes and Measures: Survey data were linked to EHR data in the year before screening. EHR measures included documentation of explicit and/or implicit medical cannabis use. Analyses estimated the primary care prevalence of cannabis use and compared EHR-documented with patient-reported medical cannabis use, accounting for stratified sampling and nonresponse. Results: Overall, 1688 patients responded to the survey (34% response rate; mean [SD] age, 50.7 [17.5] years; 861 female [56%], 1184 White [74%], 1514 non-Hispanic [97%], and 1059 commercially insured [65%]). The primary care prevalence of any past-year patient-reported cannabis use on the survey was 38.8% (95% CI, 31.9%-46.1%), whereas the prevalence of explicit and implicit medical use were 26.5% (95% CI, 21.6%-31.3%) and 35.1% (95% CI, 29.3%-40.8%), respectively. The prevalence of EHR-documented medical cannabis use was 4.8% (95% CI, 3.45%-6.2%). Compared with patient-reported explicit medical use, the sensitivity and specificity of EHR-documented medical cannabis use were 10.0% (95% CI, 4.4%-15.6%) and 97.1% (95% CI, 94.4%-99.8%), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that medical cannabis use is common among primary care patients in a state with legal use, and most use is not documented in the EHR. Patient report of health reasons for cannabis use identifies more medical use compared with explicit questions about medical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.