Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35604685›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Evaluation of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Physicians Compared With Nonphysicians.

Maria C Cusimano, Nancy N Baxter, Rinku Sutradhar, Eric McArthur, Joel G Ray, Amit X Garg, Simone Vigod, Andrea N Simpson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Endoscopy during pregnancy].Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Pregnancy complications and loss: an observational survey comparing anesthesiologists and obstetrician-gynecologists.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2024
    Observational
  5. Physician infertility: a structured literature review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Acute care related to cannabis use during pregnancy after the legalization of nonmedical cannabis in Ontario.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria C CusimanoDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nancy N BaxterMelbourne School of Population & Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rinku SutradharICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eric McArthurICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joel G RayICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amit X GargICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Simone VigodICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrea N SimpsonDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAUniversity of Toronto · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUnity Health TorontoWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Physicians may be at risk of pregnancy complications due to prolonged work hours, overnight shifts, occupational hazards, and older maternal age at first birth compared with nonphysicians. Observational studies of physicians, including comparisons across physician specialties, are needed. Objective: To compare adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes between pregnant physicians and nonphysicians and between physicians of different specialties. Design, Setting, and Participants: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted in Ontario, Canada. Participants included physicians and nonphysician comparators residing in high-income areas who experienced a birth at 20 or more weeks' gestation from April 1, 2002, to November 26, 2018. Data analysis was performed from December 2020 to March 2022. Exposures: Physician occupation and physician specialty. Main Outcomes and Measures: Severe maternal morbidity (in pregnancy and up to 42 days' post partum) and severe neonatal morbidity (up to hospital discharge among live-born infants) were the primary outcomes. Logistic regression under a generalized estimating equations approach was used to compare outcomes between physicians and nonphysicians, accounting for potentially more than 1 pregnancy per woman. Odds ratios were adjusted (aOR) for maternal age, parity, previous preterm birth, calendar year, immigration status, comorbidities, multiple gestation, and mode of delivery. Results: A total of 10 489 births occurred among 6161 licensed physicians, and 298 683 births occurred among 211 191 nonphysician counterparts. Physicians were older (median [IQR] age, 34 [31-36] vs 32 [29-35] years) and more likely to be nulliparous (5049 [48.1%] vs 128 961 [43.2%]) compared with nonphysicians. Severe maternal morbidity was more likely to occur among physicians than nonphysicians (unadjusted OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.41) but not after adjusting for study covariates (aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.97-1.32). Severe neonatal morbidity was less likely to occur among infants of physicians than infants of nonphysicians (aOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.87). Compared with family physicians, neither nonsurgical specialists (aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.82-1.53) nor surgical specialists (aOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.74-2.76) were at increased risk of severe maternal morbidity. Similar findings were observed for severe neonatal morbidity (nonsurgical specialists: aOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.80-1.19; surgical specialists: aOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.68-1.71). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that female physicians may be at slightly higher risk of severe maternal morbidity. This association appeared to be mediated by their tendency to delay childbearing compared with nonphysicians. Newborns of physicians appear to experience less morbidity. Such differences were not observed between physician specialty groups.

Indexed as

PhysiciansPremature BirthAdultFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornOntarioPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35604685
PMCPMC9127555
OpenAlexW4281385795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.