ArticleJAMA network open2022
Evaluation of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Physicians Compared With Nonphysicians.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Children With Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- [Endoscopy during pregnancy].Zeitschrift fur Gastroenterologie · 2025Article
- Processes of obstetrical care and outcomes among Ontario physicians versus non-physicians: a population-based study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Pregnancy complications and loss: an observational survey comparing anesthesiologists and obstetrician-gynecologists.The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2024Observational
- Physician infertility: a structured literature review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Resident and Fellow Perspectives on Family Planning and Building During Training.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Predictors of Burnout Among Resident Family Physicians.Family medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of employer-covered planned oocyte cryopreservation on decision-making for medical training.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Age affects the association between socioeconomic status and infertility: a cross-sectional study.BMC women's health · 2023Article
- Women's Employment in Industries and Risk of Preeclampsia and Gestational Diabetes: A National Population Study of Republic of Korea.Safety and health at work · 2023Article
- Medical Societies Must Choose Professional Meeting Locations Responsibly in a Post-Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023Article
- Burning Matches: Arguments for Improving the Match Process for Physician Trainee Couples.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023Article
- Acute care related to cannabis use during pregnancy after the legalization of nonmedical cannabis in Ontario.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023Article
- Pregnancy challenges and outcomes among female physicians.Discoveries (Craiova, Romania)Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Physicians may be at risk of pregnancy complications due to prolonged work hours, overnight shifts, occupational hazards, and older maternal age at first birth compared with nonphysicians. Observational studies of physicians, including comparisons across physician specialties, are needed. Objective: To compare adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes between pregnant physicians and nonphysicians and between physicians of different specialties. Design, Setting, and Participants: A population-based retrospective cohort study was conducted in Ontario, Canada. Participants included physicians and nonphysician comparators residing in high-income areas who experienced a birth at 20 or more weeks' gestation from April 1, 2002, to November 26, 2018. Data analysis was performed from December 2020 to March 2022. Exposures: Physician occupation and physician specialty. Main Outcomes and Measures: Severe maternal morbidity (in pregnancy and up to 42 days' post partum) and severe neonatal morbidity (up to hospital discharge among live-born infants) were the primary outcomes. Logistic regression under a generalized estimating equations approach was used to compare outcomes between physicians and nonphysicians, accounting for potentially more than 1 pregnancy per woman. Odds ratios were adjusted (aOR) for maternal age, parity, previous preterm birth, calendar year, immigration status, comorbidities, multiple gestation, and mode of delivery. Results: A total of 10 489 births occurred among 6161 licensed physicians, and 298 683 births occurred among 211 191 nonphysician counterparts. Physicians were older (median [IQR] age, 34 [31-36] vs 32 [29-35] years) and more likely to be nulliparous (5049 [48.1%] vs 128 961 [43.2%]) compared with nonphysicians. Severe maternal morbidity was more likely to occur among physicians than nonphysicians (unadjusted OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.41) but not after adjusting for study covariates (aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.97-1.32). Severe neonatal morbidity was less likely to occur among infants of physicians than infants of nonphysicians (aOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.87). Compared with family physicians, neither nonsurgical specialists (aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.82-1.53) nor surgical specialists (aOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.74-2.76) were at increased risk of severe maternal morbidity. Similar findings were observed for severe neonatal morbidity (nonsurgical specialists: aOR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.80-1.19; surgical specialists: aOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.68-1.71). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that female physicians may be at slightly higher risk of severe maternal morbidity. This association appeared to be mediated by their tendency to delay childbearing compared with nonphysicians. Newborns of physicians appear to experience less morbidity. Such differences were not observed between physician specialty groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.