Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35604627›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2022

Glioblastoma, an opportunity T cell trafficking could bring for the treatment.

Mehdi Karimi-Shahri, Malihe Khorramdel, Sara Zarei, Fatemeh Attarian, Pedram Hashemian, Hossein Javid

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mehdi Karimi-ShahriDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Malihe KhorramdelDepartment of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Amol Branch, Amol, Iran.
Sara ZareiDepartment of Biology, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, Mashhad, Iran.
Fatemeh AttarianDepartment of Biology, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch, Mashhad, Iran.
Pedram HashemianJahad Daneshgahi Research Committee, Jahad Daneshgahi Institute, Mashhad, Iran.
Hossein JavidDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Javidh@varastegan.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2248-7708
Islamic Azad University, Mashhad · IRMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRIslamic Azad University, Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInfiltrating into the vital structure of the brain, located in the inaccessible anatomical region, and having molecular heterogeneity, glioblastoma (GBM) -with no doubt- is one of the deadliest cancers. Using the blood and brain barrier (BBB), GBM makes a shield to restrict the reach of chemotherapeutic agents to the tumor site and evolves a unique microenvironment to furnish all the essentials for cancer cells survival to conceal neoplastic cells from immunosurveillance.

methods99 papers which met the criteria of eligibility were included in this review by consensus. The included articles were classified based on their design and level of evidence.

resultsGiven this characteristic, immunotherapies for a while enjoyed unprecedented attention as a solution for GBM treatment; however, it did not take long before the enthusiasm for their application was muted. It became apparent that cancer cells intelligently find a way to manipulate the anti-tumor responses of agents by attracting immunosuppressive lymphocytes into the brain using the lymphatic vessels. This event makes GBM a good model for immunotherapy resistance. However, the presence of lymphatic vessels has fired up an idea of the adoptive attraction of effector T lymphocytes to the tumor milieu. This was when engineering and cloning technologies, which have given life to one of the recent treatment strategies using artificial T cells named chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) T-cells, came to action to design specific CAR T-cells for the treatment of GBM.

conclusionThe present review summarizes the recent advances in CAR T-cell-based treatments in GBM and discusses why this approach could be positioned as a pillar of the next-generation of immunotherapies for this type of brain tumor.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveT-LymphocytesTumor MicroenvironmentReceptors, Chimeric AntigenCAR T-cellsGlioblastomaImmunotherapyT cell Trafficking

Identifiers

PMID35604627
OpenAlexW4281285772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.