Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35604488›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022

Reattachable fiducial skin marker for automatic multimodality registration.

Benjamin J Mittmann, Alexander Seitel, Gernot Echner, Wiebke Johnen, Regula Gnirs, Lena Maier-Hein, Alfred M Franz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multimodal HSI-MRI system for tumor delineation in neurosurgical guidance.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin J MittmannMedical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, BW, Germany. benjamin.mittmann@thu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2218-558X
Alexander SeitelDepartment of Computer Assisted Medical Interventions, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 223, 69120, Heidelberg, BW, Germany.
Gernot EchnerDepartment of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, BW, Germany.
Wiebke JohnenDepartment of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, BW, Germany.
Regula GnirsDepartment of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, BW, Germany.
Lena Maier-HeinMedical Faculty, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, BW, Germany.
Alfred M FranzDepartment of Computer Science, Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Albert-Einstein-Allee 55, 89081, Ulm, BW, Germany. alfred.franz@thu.de.
German Cancer Research Center · DEUniversität Ulm · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie ZF4640301GR8Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt Project OP 4.1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFusing image information has become increasingly important for optimal diagnosis and treatment of the patient. Despite intensive research towards markerless registration approaches, fiducial marker-based methods remain the default choice for a wide range of applications in clinical practice. However, as especially non-invasive markers cannot be positioned reproducibly in the same pose on the patient, pre-interventional imaging has to be performed immediately before the intervention for fiducial marker-based registrations.

methodsWe propose a new non-invasive, reattachable fiducial skin marker concept for multi-modal registration approaches including the use of electromagnetic or optical tracking technologies. We furthermore describe a robust, automatic fiducial marker localization algorithm for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. Localization of the new fiducial marker has been assessed for different marker configurations using both CT and MRI. Furthermore, we applied the marker in an abdominal phantom study. For this, we attached the marker at three poses to the phantom, registered ten segmented targets of the phantom's CT image to live ultrasound images and determined the target registration error (TRE) for each target and each marker pose.

resultsReattachment of the marker was possible with a mean precision of 0.02 mm ± 0.01 mm. Our algorithm successfully localized the marker automatically in all ([Formula: see text]) evaluated CT/MRI images. Depending on the marker pose, the mean ([Formula: see text]) TRE of the abdominal phantom study ranged from 1.51 ± 0.75 mm to 4.65 ± 1.22 mm.

conclusionsThe non-invasive, reattachable skin marker concept allows reproducible positioning of the marker and automatic localization in different imaging modalities. The low TREs indicate the potential applicability of the marker concept for clinical interventions, such as the puncture of abdominal lesions, where current image-based registration approaches still lack robustness and existing marker-based methods are often impractical.

Indexed as

Fiducial MarkersMultimodal ImagingAlgorithmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPhantoms, ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedAutomatic multimodality registrationFiducial marker assessmentReattachable fiducial skin marker

Identifiers

PMID35604488
PMCPMC9515062
OpenAlexW4281287445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.