ArticleJournal of neurology2022
Imaging and genetics in Parkinson's disease: assessment of the GBA1 mutation.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-omics insights into GBA1-associated Parkinson's disease: interplay of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and lipidomics.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2026Review
- The Molecular Impact of Glucosylceramidase Beta 1 (Gba1) in Parkinson's Disease: a New Genetic State of the Art.Molecular neurobiology · 2024Review
- Parkinson's Disease Risk Variant rs9638616 is Non-Specifically Associated with Altered Brain Structure and Function.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2024Article
- A review on Gaucher disease: therapeutic potential of β-glucocerebrosidase-targeted mRNA/saRNA approach.International journal of biological sciences · 2024Review
- Imaging Markers in Genetic Forms of Parkinson's Disease.Brain sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSeveral genetic variants are associated with an increased risk for developing Parkinson's Disease (PD) and limited genotype/phenotype correlation. Specifically, mutations in GBA1, the gene coding for the lysosomal enzyme glucocerebrosidase, are associated with an earlier age of onset and faster disease progression. Given these phenotypic differences associated with GBA1 variants, we explored whether cortical thickness and other biomarkers of neurodegeneration differed in healthy controls and PD patients with and without GBA1 variants.
methodsTo understand how different GBA1 variants influence PD phenotype early in the disease, we retrieved neuroimaging and biospecimen data from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative database. Using FreeSurfer, we compared T1-weighted MRI images from healthy controls (N = 47) to PD patients with heterozygous N370S (N = 21), heterozygous E326K (N = 18) or heterozygous T369M (N = 8) variants, and GBA1 non-mutation carriers (N = 47).
resultsCortical thickness in PD patients differed from controls in the parietal cortex, with E365K, T369M variants, and GBA1 non-mutation carriers showing more cortical thinning than N370S variants. Patients with N370S variants had significantly higher serum neurofilament light levels among all groups.
conclusionOur results demonstrate significant cortical thinning in PD patients independent of genotype in superior parietal and postcentral regions when compared to the controls. They highlight the impact of GBA1 variants on cortical thickness in the parietal cortex. Finally, they suggest that recently diagnosed PD patients with N370S variants have a higher cortical thickness and increased active neurodegeneration when compared to PD patients without GBA1 mutations and PD patients with E326K or T369M variants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.