Trial reportJournal of neurology2022
The efficacy of a directed rhythmic-melodic voice training in the treatment of chronic non-fluent aphasia-Behavioral and imaging results.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Music-based interventions for nonfluent aphasia: A systematic review of randomized control trials.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Structural and functional neuroplasticity in music and dance-based rehabilitation: a systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2025Pooled it
- Functional neuroplasticity in chronic post-stroke aphasia following a singing intervention in a cross-over randomised trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Systematic review and meta-analysis reveal positive therapeutic effects of music in brain damage rehabilitation.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026Review
- Article
- A Review on Music Interventions for Frontotemporal Aphasia and a Proposal for Alternative Treatments.Biomedicines · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of a directed rhythmic-melodic voice training (SIPARI) compared to language therapy with the focus on improvement in expressive linguistic performance. 20 patients suffering from chronic non-fluent aphasia, allocated by coin tossing to either of the groups, participated in 32 single therapy sessions over a period of 4 months. Before and after therapy, independent testers performed a standardized language test (Aachener Aphasie Test). Behavioral assessments revealed that improvements of patients of the experimental group were clinically significant compared to those of the control group. These improvements concerned the description level articulation and prosody for spontaneous speech and the subtests repetition, naming, and comprehension. Based on these improvements, a significant increase in profile level (effect size (ES) = 2.028, p < 0.001) was assessed, an overall and clinically relevant measure of the severity of aphasia. Additional fMRI examinations yielded activation in the left superior frontal gyrus for the post-minus pre- therapy assessments only for participants of the experimental group. Since this brain region is reported to be particularly involved in executive processing, we assume that the directed procedure of the SIPARI treatment with regard to musical, linguistic, and cognitive function potentially holds the key for successful language rehabilitation. While our imaging results hint at a possible explanation for its efficacy, our behavioral results corroborate the efficacy of this therapy in the treatment of chronic non-fluent aphasia patients. DRKS00026730, 19.10.21, retrospectively registered https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00026730.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.