Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35604337›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2022

The metabolic equivalent of task score : a useful metric for comparing high-functioning hip arthroplasty patients.

Thomas C Edwards, Brogan Guest, Amy Garner, Kartik Logishetty, Alexander D Liddle, Justin P Cobb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas C EdwardsMSk Lab, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6515-070X
Brogan GuestMSk Lab, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, London, UK.
Amy GarnerMSk Lab, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7839-0641
Kartik LogishettyMSk Lab, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, London, UK.
Alexander D LiddleMSk Lab, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, London, UK.
Justin P CobbMSk Lab, Imperial College London, Sir Michael Uren Biomedical Engineering Research Hub, London, UK.
NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study investigates the use of the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) score in a young hip arthroplasty population, and its ability to capture additional benefit beyond the ceiling effect of conventional patient-reported outcome measures.

methodsFrom our electronic database of 751 hip arthroplasty procedures, 221 patients were included. Patients were excluded if they had revision surgery, an alternative hip procedure, or incomplete data either preoperatively or at one-year follow-up. Included patients had a mean age of 59.4 years (SD 11.3) and 54.3% were male, incorporating 117 primary total hip and 104 hip resurfacing arthroplasty operations. Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), and the MET were recorded preoperatively and at one-year follow-up. The distribution was examined reporting the presence of ceiling and floor effects. Validity was assessed correlating the MET with the other scores using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and determining responsiveness. A subgroup of 93 patients scoring 48/48 on the OHS were analyzed by age, sex, BMI, and preoperative MET using the other metrics to determine if differences could be established despite scoring identically on the OHS.

resultsPostoperatively the OHS and EQ-5D demonstrate considerable negatively skewed distributions with ceiling effects of 41.6% and 53.8%, respectively. The MET was normally distributed postoperatively with no relevant ceiling effect. Weak-to-moderate significant correlations were found between the MET and the other two metrics. In the 48/48 subgroup, no differences were found comparing groups with the EQ-5D, however significantly higher mean MET scores were demonstrated for patients aged < 60 years (12.7 (SD 4.7) vs 10.6 (SD 2.4), p = 0.008), male patients (12.5 (SD 4.5) vs 10.8 (SD 2.8), p = 0.024), and those with preoperative MET scores > 6 (12.6 (SD 4.2) vs 11.0 (SD 3.3), p = 0.040).

conclusionThe MET is normally distributed in patients following hip arthroplasty, recording levels of activity which are undetectable using the OHS. Cite this article:

Indexed as

BMICeiling effectcorrelation coefficientEQ-5D scoresEuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D)hipHip arthroplastyhip arthroplasty surgeryhip resurfacing arthroplastyOxford Hip Scores (OHS)Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)PROMsrevision surgery

Identifiers

PMID35604337
PMCPMC9130675
OpenAlexW4281395814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.